Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of post-amputation neuromas in patients with traumatic amputations

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study is relevant due to the high prevalence of blast injuries and limb amputations in combat zones and areas affected by terrorism. Post-amputation neuromas are among the most common and severe complications of limb amputation, as they can cause marked pain, sensory and motor impairments, and significantly reduce the quality of life. Ultrasound imaging is used for timely and accurate diagnosis of post-amputation neuromas, particularly for evaluating their clinical and ultrasound characteristics. This enables selection of the most effective treatment and preventive strategies.

AIM: This study aimed to determine the clinical and imaging characteristics of nerve trunks after limb amputation, as well as to identify the structural features of post-amputation neuromas.

METHODS: A premium-class portable Viamo ultrasound scanner (Canon/Toshiba, Japan) was used with a 58-mm linear transducer (frequency range 5–12 MHz). Ultrasound examinations were performed without preparation and included B-mode scanning in longitudinal and transverse planes, with color coded Doppler flow mapping. The nerves of the injured limb and the intact limb were examined. Peripheral limb nerves were examined using a standard ultrasound protocol. The study parameters included nerve trunk contour integrity, echostructure, and echogenicity; trunk size and shape; the presence of a terminal neuroma, its shape, longitudinal dimension, diameter, and cross-sectional area; and the distance from the neuroma to the distal end of the stump. Standard ultrasound software was used for image processing and measurements.

RESULTS: Post-amputation neuromas were detected in at least one nerve in 38 of 40 patients. A total of 53 neuromas were identified in 45 post-amputation stumps. In 12 patients, two or more neuromas were identified in the proximal portion of the amputated limb. We evaluated changes in echogenicity and echostructure of the proximal nerve segments in amputated limbs, regardless of the size of the affected area.

CONCLUSION: Ultrasound imaging of peripheral nerves is a valuable diagnostic tool that quickly evaluates the condition of the nerve trunk and its clinical and morphological characteristics, and it does not require special patient preparation. Ultrasound imaging may also be used to prevent phantom limb syndrome after amputation and to evaluate stump deformity when designing prosthetics.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Albert R. Bulatov

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: albert_br@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7180-4389
SPIN-code: 1626-8400

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Igor V. Litvinenko

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: litvinenkoiv@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8988-3011
SPIN-code: 6112-2792

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Tatyana A. Kolesnik

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: taniakolesnik061@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-6722-1427
SPIN-code: 1988-4155
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nikolay V. Tsygan

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: 1860n@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5881-2242
SPIN-code: 1006-2845

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Irina S. Sinelnikova

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Author for correspondence.
Email: sinelnikova_is@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-5035-9327
SPIN-code: 7350-9798
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Miroslav M. Odinak

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: odinak@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7314-7711
SPIN-code: 1155-9732

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Sergey V. Kolomentsev

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: skolomencev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3756-6214
SPIN-code: 6439-6701

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Peter A. Polezhaev

Military Medical Academy of S.M. Kirov

Email: polezhaev76@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7771-2229
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Zotov PB, Smirnov AV, Vakulin AA, et al. Pain syndromes in lower limb amputation: clinical and epidemiological aspects and drug therapy. Palliativnaja medicina i reabilitacija. 2007;(1):5–10. (In Russ.) EDN: MPXIND
  2. Culp CJ, Abdi S. Current understanding of phantom pain and its treatment. Pain Physician. 2022;25(7):E941–E957.
  3. Sugawara AT, Simis M, Fregni F, Battistella LR. Characterisation of phantom limb pain in traumatic lower-limb amputees. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:2706731. doi: 10.1155/2021/2706731
  4. Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Stewart R, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and risk factors: a multivariate analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24(6):578–585. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00538-9
  5. Limakatso K, Bedwell GJ, Madden VJ, Parker R. The prevalence and risk factors for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240431 EDN: PTYVVU
  6. Griffin SC, Alphonso AL, Tung M, et al. Characteristics of phantom limb pain in U.S. civilians and service members. Scand J Pain. 2021;22(1):125–132. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0139 EDN: JNDCWY
  7. Oliveira KMC, Pindur L, Han Z, et al. Time course of traumatic neuroma development. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200548
  8. Mota SJ, Pereira da Silva FMGS, Gil-Pereira M, et al. Peripheral nerve ultrasound—anatomy and technique for diagnosis and procedures. In: ECR 2014. 2014. Vol. 112. P. 1–48. doi: 10.1594/ecr2014/C-2342
  9. Es'kin NA, Matveeva NYu, Pripisnova SG. Potentialities of ultra sound examination in diagnosis of injuries and diseases of upper extremity peripheral nerves. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2008;(2):82–88. EDN: JTGGEF
  10. Tatarina AV, Dubrovskikh SN, Gumerova EA, et al. Results of multiparametric ultrasound examinationof peripheral nerves in combat trauma. Hospital Medicine: Science and Practice. 2024;7(2):54–62. doi: 10.34852/GM3CVKG.2024.26.19.009 EDN: HMNALU
  11. Tatarina AV, Dubrovskikh SN, Gumerova EA. Ultrasound diagnostics in the assessment of traumatic peripheral nerve damage in combat trauma. Digital Diagnostics. 2023;4(S1):129–132. doi: 10.17816/DD430369 EDN: UYQQQK
  12. Gaivoronsky AI, Zhurbin EA, Dekan VS, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound research in surgery of peripheral nerves of upper limb. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2015;(2):56–59. EDN: TVSSZN
  13. Dubrovskikh SN, Tatarina AV, Gumerova EA, Koryagina AD. Ultrasound as the main method for diagnosing peripheral nerve injuries in mine blast trauma. Digital Diagnostics. 2023;4(S1):46–49. doi: 10.17816/DD430341 EDN: BOTEWQ
  14. Bulatov AR. Clinical and instrumental characteristics and metabolic therapy of traumatic neuropathies of the extremities [dissertation]. Saint Petersburg; 2020. (In Russ.) EDN: EJOJYL
  15. Kolomentsev SV, Polezhaev PA, Gaivoronsky AI, et al. Modern concepts of treatment of phantom limb pain. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2023;25(3):515–527. doi: 10.17816/brmma340914 EDN: TSCZDS
  16. Buchheit T, Van de Ven T, Hsia HL, et al. Pain phenotypes and associated clinical risk factors following traumatic amputation: results from Veterans Integrated Pain Evaluation Research (VIPER). Pain Med. 2016;17(1):149–161. doi: 10.1111/pme.12848
  17. Chung BM, Lee GY, Kim WT, et al. MRI features of symptomatic amputation neuromas. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(10):7684–7695. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07954-2 EDN: FPXMXU
  18. Buch NS, Qerama E, Brix Finnerup N, Nikolajsen L. Neuromas and postamputation pain. Pain. 2020;161(1):147–155. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001705

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Sonograms of nerves in patients with amputation stumps at the foot level: a — amputation stump of the left foot according to Chopart, sonogram of the left sciatic nerve at the level of the lower third of the thigh; b — amputation stump of the right foot according to Lisfranc, sonogram of the right tibial and peroneal nerves at the popliteal fossa; c — amputation stump of the right foot according to Chopart, sonogram of the right tibial nerve at the upper third of the lower leg.

Download (171KB)
3. Fig. 2. Amputation stumps at the level of the lower thirds of both thighs: a — sonogram of the left sciatic nerve; b — sonogram of the right sciatic nerve, white arrow — posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh; c — sonogram of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh (white arrow); d — neuroma of the right sciatic nerve; e — external view of amputation stumps at the lower third of both thighs.

Download (210KB)
4. Fig. 3. Sonograms of nerves in patients with amputation stumps at various levels: a–c — amputation stump of the lower third of the left thigh, sonogram of nerves: a — spindle-shaped neuroma of the left tibial nerve (7 cm from the epicone of the stump); b — spear-shaped neuroma of the left peroneal nerve (at a distance of 5 cm from the epicone of the stump); c — spear-shaped neuroma of the left sural nerve (n. suralis) (at a distance of 3 cm from the epicone of the stump); d — external view of the patient's left thigh stump; e — fusiform neuroma of the patient's right median nerve; f — fusiform neuroma of the patient's left sciatic nerve; g — scarred neuroma of the superficial branch of the patient's right radial nerve; i — tree-like neuroma of the patient's right ulnar nerve.

Download (255KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия  ПИ № ФС 77 - 86296 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г
.