Biliopancreatic limb length for one anastomosis gastric bypass: efficacy and safety



如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The therapeutic effect of minigastric (one-anastomosis gastric) bypass is based on the mechanism of hypoabsorption. The length of the small intestine segment disconnected from the absorption processes of food nutrients and trace elements directly determines the efficacy of the intervention and the risk of postoperative complications, but its optimal choice is still debatable. The literature review analyzes anatomical and functional changes in the gastrointestinal tract after one-anastomosis gastric bypass, discusses the pathogenesis and the relationship of postoperative nutritional deficiencies with the biliopancreatic limb length. It has been shown that the current trend of bariatric surgery is the rejection of the routine choice of a 200 cm biliopancreatic loop in favor of 150-175 cm, while information on the variability of the small intestine length in patients with morbid obesity (from 250 to 1300 cm) does not allow us to consider this approach absolutely safe and effective. The results of experimental and clinical studies on comparable results of achieving remission of comorbid pathology with different lengths of the biliopancreatic loop, regardless of the volume of total weight loss, are presented. The feasibility of individual determination of the biliopancreatic loop length taking into account the total size of the patient's small intestine has not yet been established, which is reflected in the results of national and international consensus conferences. It has been shown that factors correlating with the intestine length of an obese patient are height, male sex, circumferences of the neck, chest, abdomen. As the minimum length of the functionally active segment of the small intestine (common loop) for the one-anastomosis gastric bypass, both 300 cm and 400 cm are discussed, and even the second value does not exclude the development of postoperative nutritional complications. For preoperative personalized planning of the ideal volume of hypoabsorption in one-anastomosis gastric bypass, the search continues for markers correlating with the small intestine total length, as well as other pathogenetic factors of morbid obesity and its complications.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Olga Teplyakova

Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: teplyakova-olga@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0005-3316

Professor,  Professor, General Surgery Department named after Professor M. I. Gulman

俄罗斯联邦

Aleksandr Chaykin

Email: chaiki@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-0994-081X

Dmitriy Chaykin

Email: сonte4@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-1761

Natalia Lukyanova

Email: nalukyanovakrsk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0477-3938

Rafael Barseghyan

Email: sofiktatijan664@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3532-5469

Nikita Grigoriev

Email: grigor750@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-5481-2038

Valeria Teplyakova

Email: teplyakova_lera08@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-9883-8785

参考

  1. Lingvay I, Cohen RV, Roux CWL, Sumithran P. Obesity in adults. Lancet. 2024; 404(10456):972-987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01210-8
  2. Doumouras AG, Lee Y, Paterson JM, et al. Association Between Bariatric Surgery and Major Adverse Diabetes Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes and Obesity. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e216820. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6820 EDN: HTSONL
  3. Aminian A, Wilson R, Al-Kurd A, et al. Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Risk and Mortality in Adults With Obesity. JAMA. 2022;327(24):2423-2433. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9009 EDN: BBIRCO
  4. Salminen P, Kow L, Aminian A, et al. IFSO Consensus on Definitions and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Obesity Management-an International Delphi Study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(1):30-42. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06913-8 EDN: JGEHAP
  5. Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The Mini-Gastric Bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019;61:38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.042
  6. Castro MJ, Jimenez JM, Carbajo MA, et al. Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207644 EDN: XMJVRK
  7. Neimark AE, Yashkov YuI, Khatsiev BB, et al. Results of the first All-Russian consensus conference on bariatric surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2024;3:87–94. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202403187 EDN: WCHEIH
  8. Chaykin D.A., Chaykin A.A., Chaykin A.N., et al. Immediate Effects of the Self-Retaining Barbed Suture Material Application for Gastrojejunostomy During Mini Gastric Bypass Laparoscopic Surgery. Journal of experimental and clinical surgery. 2023;16:4:272-281. doi: 10.18499/2070-478X-2023-16-4-272-281 EDN: SAPPHH
  9. Latteri S, Sofia M, Puleo S, et al. Mechanisms linking bariatric surgery to adipose tissue, glucose metabolism, fatty liver disease and gut microbiota. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02821-8 EDN: MCNKBU
  10. Jedamzik J, Eilenberg M, Felsenreich DM, et al. Impact of limb length on nutritional status in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):476-484. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.012 EDN: JXOGJC
  11. De Bandt D, Rives-Lange C, Frigout Y, et al. Similar Gut Hormone Secretions Two Years After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Pilot Study. Obes Surg. 2022;32(3):757-762. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05837-5 EDN: HKMDLX
  12. Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439-3445. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7 EDN: NYRVNI
  13. Salman MA, Salman A, Assal MM, et al. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1846-1856. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06556-9 EDN: OFLKXA
  14. Yakovenko IY, Mkrtumyan AM, Botov AA, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass: a way to normalize insulin secretion in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, regardless of clinically significant weight loss. Endoscopic Surgery = Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2021;27(6):38–42. doi: 10.17116/endoskop20212706138 EDN: PHOLJP
  15. Mika A, Kaska L, Proczko-Stepaniak M, et al. Evidence That the Length of Bile Loop Determines Serum Bile Acid Concentration and Glycemic Control After Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3405-3414. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3314-9 EDN: OJDFJW
  16. Kaniel O, Sherf-Dagan S, Szold A, et al. The Effects of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery on the Gastrointestinal Tract. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):304. doi: 10.3390/nu14020304 EDN: TWZFDC
  17. Binnetoğlu K. Nutrition and Patient Follow-up in Bariatric Surgery. Eurasian J Med. 2023;55(1):S70-S74. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.23333 EDN: TXUTSH
  18. Shirazi N, Beglaibter N, Grinbaum R, Ahmad WA, Aronis A. Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy. Nutrients. 2022;14(13):2597. doi: 10.3390/nu14132597 EDN: SMSOPO
  19. Tasdighi E, Barzin M, Mahawar KK, et al. Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Weight Loss, Postoperative Complications, and Remission of Comorbidities in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32(3):892-903. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05848-2 EDN: XCIDGS
  20. Kermansaravi M, Shahsavan M, Hage K, et al. Iron deficiency anemia after one anastomosis gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2025;39(3):1509-1522. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11535-5 EDN: PLIKMJ
  21. Abu-Abeid A, Goren O, Eldar SM, et al. Revisional Surgery of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Severe Protein-Energy Malnutrition. Nutrients. 2022;14(11):2356. doi: 10.3390/nu14112356 EDN: LNGUGY
  22. Motamedi MAK, Barzin M, Ebrahimi M, Ebrahimi R, Khalaj A. Severe fatal protein malnutrition and liver failure in a morbidly obese patient after mini-gastric bypass surgery: Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;33:71-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.02.033
  23. Motamedi MAK, Rakhshani N, Khalaj A, Barzin M. Biopsy-proven progressive fatty liver disease nine months post mini-gastric bypass surgery: A case study. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;39:168-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.07.062
  24. Sam MA, Hussain A, Pegler ME, et al. Effect of one anastomosis gastric bypass on liver function tests: A comparison between 150 cm and 200 cm biliopancreatic limbs. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18(1):38-44. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_249_20 EDN: BFBFAK
  25. Jedamzik J, Pedarnig L, Bichler C, et al. Management of nutritional deficiencies following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): a single-center experience. Updates Surg. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02094-4 EDN: ZYINKR
  26. Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625-1634. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04519-y EDN: RIVXHA
  27. Abu-Abeid A, Yuval JB, Keidar A, et al. Technical Considerations in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-the Israeli Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Experience. Obes Surg. 2024;34(7):2356-2362. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07223-3
  28. Salminen P, Kow L, Aminian A, et al. IFSO Consensus on Definitions and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Obesity Management-an International Delphi Study. Obes Surg. 2024;34(1):30-42. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06913-8 EDN: LUOPKD
  29. Jain M, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. Tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass - Subgroup analysis of a randomised control trial based on bilio-pancreatic limb length with long-term results of 101 patients. J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18(2):264-272. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_117_21 EDN: YNVCHK
  30. Kermansaravi M, Pishgahroudsari M, Kabir A, Abdolhosseini MR, Pazouki A. Weight loss after one-anastomosis/mini-gastric bypass - The impact of biliopancreatic limb: A retrospective cohort study. J Res Med Sci. 2020;25:5. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_117_19 EDN: TBKFZU
  31. Slagter N, de Heide LJM, Jutte EH, et al. Outcomes of the One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with Various Biliopancreatic Limb Lengths: a Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(10):4236-4242. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05555-y EDN: CZWCHF
  32. Salman MA, Salman A, Assal MM, et al. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2023;33(6):1846-1856. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06556-9 EDN: OFLKXA
  33. Jaworski P, Binda A, Barski K, et al. OAGB with shortened excluded ileal loop as an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the cases of Caucasian men and women with obesity of the first degree (BMI 30-35 kg/m2). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02785-9 EDN: LWVBLW
  34. Balamurugan G, Sinclair P, Sesby-Banjoh O, et al. Optimal Bilio-Pancreatic Limb (BPL) Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Surgery. Curr Obes Rep. 2025;14(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00608-0 EDN: CVGEVJ
  35. Evdoshenko VV, Fedenko VV, Bordan NS, Matveev NL, Tsepkovsky AS. One-anastomosis gastric bypass with a short limb. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2020;11:37–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202011137 EDN: BSYWYJ
  36. Liagre A, Martini F, Kassir R, et al. Is One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm Effective in the Treatment of People with Severe Obesity with BMI > 50? Obes Surg. 2021;31(9):3966-3974. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05499-3 EDN: CRCPDK
  37. Eskandaros MS. Outcomes and Effects of 250-cm Biliopancreatic Limb One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 with Total Bowel Length > 6 m: a 2-Year Follow-up. Obes Surg. 2022;32(7):2309-2320. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06078-w EDN: FRFMUJ
  38. Lazaridis II, Bosch AJT, Keller L, et al. Metabolic outcomes in obese mice undergoing one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with a long or a short biliopancreatic limb. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024;326(6):E819-E831. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00327.2023 EDN: ULRDXE
  39. Ribeiro-Parenti L, El Jindi H, Willemetz A, et al. Shortening the Biliopancreatic Limb Length of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Maintains Glucose Homeostasis Improvement with Limited Weight Loss. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17):4976. doi: 10.3390/jcm11174976 EDN: VDQFHG
  40. Marciniak C, Chávez-Talavera O, Caiazzo R, et al. Characterization of one anastomosis gastric bypass and impact of biliary and common limbs on bile acid and postprandial glucose metabolism in a minipig model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021;320(4):E772-E783. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00356.2020 EDN: KIASNU
  41. Focquet M. The length of the biliopancreatic limb in one anastomosis gastric bypass. Front Surg. 2024;11:1248744. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1248744 EDN: CKLYYD
  42. Bekheit M, Ibrahim MY, Tobar W, Galal I, Elward AS. Correlation Between the Total Small Bowel Length and Anthropometric Measures in Living Humans: Cross-Sectional Study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):681-686. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04238-z EDN: WRVLTL
  43. Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Eichelter J, et al. Bariatric Surgery-How Much Malabsorption Do We Need?-A Review of Various Limb Lengths in Different Gastric Bypass Procedures. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):674. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040674 EDN: JOTQHZ
  44. Soong TC, Almalki OM, Lee WJ, et al. Measuring the small bowel length may decrease the incidence of malnutrition after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with tailored bypass limb. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(10):1712-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.010
  45. Mostafapour E, Shahsavan M, Shahmiri SS, et al. Prevention of malnutrition after one anastomosis gastric bypass: value of the common channel limb length. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02438-8 EDN: HHVCKK
  46. Raines D, Arbour A, Thompson HW, Figueroa-Bodine J, Joseph S. Variation in small bowel length: factor in achieving total enteroscopy? Dig Endosc. 2015;27(1):67-72. doi: 10.1111/den.12309
  47. Almalki OM, Soong TC, Lee WJ, et al. Variation in Small Bowel Length and Its Influence on the Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):36-42. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04958-7 EDN: AMVUJS
  48. Liu Z, Huang Z, Zhang Y, et al. Chinese Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Collaborative. Correlation of T2DM and Anthropometric Measures with Total Small Bowel Length and Its Effects on Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg. 2024;34(4):1238-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07105- EDN: PHINDI
  49. Slagter N, van Wilsum M, de Heide LJM, et al. Laparoscopic Small Bowel Length Measurement in Bariatric Surgery Using a Hand-Over-Hand Technique with Marked Graspers: an Ex Vivo Experiment. Obes Surg. 2022;32(4):1201-1208. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05918-z EDN: MQGTQX
  50. Slagter N, de Heide LJM, Jutte EH, et al. Tailoring limb length based on total small bowel length in one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery (TAILOR study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06456-w EDN: DYHIEZ
  51. Slagter N, van der Laan L, de Heide LJM, et al. Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial. Br J Surg. 2024;111(9):znae219. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae219 EDN: VACXYF
  52. Abu-Abeid A, Ovadya R, Gosher N, et al. Tailored Biliopancreatic Limb Length to 40% of Total Small Bowel Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (TABLE-40): Protocol of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08035-9

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector,



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия  ПИ № ФС 77 - 86296 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г
.