Distinctive Features of Using the Propulsor of the Underwater Sail Type the Direct-Flow Wave Propulsor on a Semisubmerged Catamaran
- 作者: Arkhangelsky E.A.1, Boyko A.V.1, Prokofyev V.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- 期: 编号 5 (2024)
- 页面: 3-14
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://medjrf.com/1024-7084/article/view/681531
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1024708424050018
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NREMAU
- ID: 681531
如何引用文章
详细
We present the results of experimental investigations of the efficiency of the direct flow wave propulsor and the propulsor of the underwater sail type on the models of semisubmerged catamaran boat with a small area of the section along the waterline. The effects observable in the case of the propulsor of the underwater sail type are qualitatively the same as for the previously studied swinging wing, namely, the greatest efficiency is observable, when the propulsor is situated near the free surface, while its efficiency is rapidly reduced with propulsor immersion. The propulsor efficiency varies only slightly with ship hull immersion, whereas the working frequencies are considerably reduced as compared with those of floating structures. In this case, the working frequencies vary in proportion to the model boat scale. Comprehensive studies of the direct-flow wave propulsor efficiency were performed, an inclined flat plate being fixed at the hulls of a semisubmerged ship as a working element. The optimal parameters of the propulsor were noted, when it efficiently operates on the waves with the greatest steepness (storm waves). Experiments showed that the efficiency of the wave propulsors of the swinging wing or underwater sail types in their operation ranges is somewhat higher than that of the direct-flow propulsor. However, under the rough water conditions the direct-flow propulsor has its own advantages, since precisely in this case it demonstrates its greatest efficiency, while the other versions considered are efficacious in the wavelength range dependent on the ship length and, generally speaking, do not coincide with the storm wave length.
全文:

作者简介
E. Arkhangelsky
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: vlad.prokof@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
A. Boyko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: mailband@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
V. Prokofyev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vlad.prokof@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
参考
- Глушко В.Н. Исследование влияния параметров морского волнения на величину тяги, создаваемой волновым движителем в виде колеблющегося крыла с упругой заделкой // Прикладная гидромеханика. 2009. Т. 11. С. 47–53.
- Прокофьев В.В., Такмазьян А.К., Филатов Е.В. Результаты испытаний судна с различными волновыми движителями в гидроканале // Изв. РАН МЖГ. 2019. № 6. C. 38–47
- Прокофьев В.В., Архангельский Е.А., Бойко А.В. Использование волновых движителей на судне с малой площадью ватерлинии // Изв. РАН МЖГ. 2023. №1. C. 41–53.
- Дубровский В.А, Главное о судах с малой площадью ватерлинии // Тр. Крыловского государственного научного центра. 2021. т. 3. № 397. C. 75–82
- Колс К.А. Под парусом в шторм /перевод с англ. 1985. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат. 128 с
- Прокофьев В.В., Бойко А.В., Чикаренко В.Г. Плавучий якорь. Патент № 2326018, 2008
- Прокофьев В.В., Такмазьян А.К., Филатов Е.В., Чикаренко В.Г., Якимов А.Ю. Судовой волнодвижитель. Патент № 2528449. 2014
- Прокофьев В.В., Такмазьян А.К., Филатов Е.В. Испытание и расчет движения модели судна с прямоточным волновым движителем // Изв. РАН МЖГ. 2017. №4. C. 24–38.
补充文件
