The rationale for introducing the indices «Generalized coliform bacteria» and «Escherichia coli» into the scheme of sanitary and microbiological control of water quality as indices of fecal contamination

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction. The increasing bacterial contamination of water bodies requires an increase in water quality control’s reliability to ensure epidemic safety against waterborne infections. Therefore, researchers in both Russia and Europe came to the conclusion that it is necessary to search for indicator microorganisms that can more accurately suggest the presence of pathogens. microorganisms in water than traditional indicators.

The aim of the study was to justify the introduction of indicator indices of fecal contamination “generalized coliform bacteria” and Escherichia coli to assess the safety of drinking water

Material and methods. The article provides an analysis of domestic and international regulatory documents and literary materials regulating the quality of drinking water in terms of sanitary and microbiological indicators and assessment criteria. The results of many years of experimental and field research carried out by research organizations and practical organizations of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare are presented.

Results. On the territory of Russia, “general coliform bacteria,” is one of the indicator indices chosen according to the fermentation of lactose, determine the safety of drinking water. The water does not take into account pathogenic bacteria (Salmonella, Shigella) and a number of lactose-negative opportunistic bacteria, causative agents of intestinal infections. The study of microorganisms isolated from the feces of patients confirms the frequency of occurrence of lactose-negative microorganisms to varying from 20 to 100% of strains. With an annual trend towards a decrease in the percentage of non-standard drinking water samples in terms of microbiological indices, general intestinal infections (GII) of unknown etiology increase, i.e. risk of GII. If the quality of drinking water does not correspond to thermotolerant coliform bacteria (TCB), 95% of samples contain E. coli. Therefore, the determination of E. coli more reliably indicates the intake of fresh fecal contamination and provides efficiency in taking measures to eliminate an unfavorable situation than TCB.

Conclusion. Reasons are given for the introduction of more reliable microbiological indicators of water safety control, such as - “generalized coliform bacteria” with the preservation of the abbreviation GCB, combining both lactose-positive and lactose-negative bacteria, determined by the sign of glucose fermentation, negative oxidase test and negative stain according to Gram and E. coli as an indicator of recent faecal contamination, which will allow the assessment of water quality for a wide range of bacteria of the order Enterobacterials, corresponding to the modern taxonomy of Enterobacteriaceae NCBI, will ensure harmonization with international requirements and the safety of drinking water for the population.

Авторлар туралы

Angelika Zagainova

Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: azagaynova@cspmz.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4772-9686

MD, Ph.D., Head of Microbiology and parasitology laboratory in the Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, 119121, Russian Federation.

e-mail: mgoshin@cspmz.ru

Ресей

Galina Trukhina

Institute for Complex Problems of Hygiene of the F.F. Erisman Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9955-7447
Ресей

Yury Rakhmanin

Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5845-588X
Ресей

Tamara Artemova

Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0986-250X
Ресей

Marina Sukhina

Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Medical Biological Agency; A.N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4795-0751
Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Ashbolt N.J., Grabow W.O.K., Snozzi M. Water Quality: Guidelines, Standards and Health. London: IWA Publishing; 2001.
  2. Bezdenezhnykh I.S. Epidemiology [Epidemiologiya]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1968. (in Russian)
  3. WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality assurance. Geneva; 2004.
  4. WHO. Guidelines for drinking water quality. Geneva; 2011.
  5. Health Canada 2013. Guidelines for Safe Drinking Water in Federal Areas. Version 2. Canada; 2013.
  6. Chrudey S.E. Safe Drinking Water Policy for Canada – Turning Retrospective into Foresight. Comment. Toronto, Ontario; 2011.
  7. Sierst J., Crawford R.L., Knudsen R., McInerney M.J., Stetzenbach L.D. Guide to Environmental Microbiology. Washington: ASM Press; 2002.
  8. Kester W., Egli T., Ashbolt N., Botzenhart K., Burlion N., Endo T., et al. WHO. Assessment of microbiological safety of drinking water: improvement of approaches and methods. Geneva; 2003: 237–92.
  9. Payment P., Waite M., Dufour A. Is 2003 Introduction of parameters for assessing the quality of drinking water. In: Assessment of the Microbiological Safety of Drinking Water. Improvement of Approaches and Methods. London: IWA Publishing; 2003: 47–77.
  10. Pinto V.G., Heller L., Bastos R.K. Drinking water standards in South America: convergence and divergence. J. Water Health. 2012; 10(2): S295–310. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2012.087
  11. Washington State Department of Healt. Drinking Water Contaminants. Available at: http://www.doh.wa.gov/CommunityandEnvironment/DrinkingWater/Contaminants/Colifor
  12. Verhille S. Understanding microbial indicators for drinking water assessment: interpretation of test results and public health significance. Available at: https://ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Microbial_Indicators_Jan_2013_0.pdf
  13. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Book Review. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1985; 408. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-35-3-408
  14. «The new format, which has an expanded scope and examines relationships between organisms (systematics), is called Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Work on the first volume in the four-volume sequence began in 1980 and was…» In: Lim D.V. Microbiology. Dubuque; Kendall Hunt; 2002.
  15. Srivastava S. Understanding bacteria. Dordrecht: Springer; 2003.
  16. Taxonomy Browser. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Undef&id=91347&lvl=3&lin=f&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock
  17. Adeolu M., Alnajar S., Naushad S., Gupta S.R. Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the ‘Enterobacteriales’: proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016; 66(12): 5575–99. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001485
  18. Jawetz E., Melnick J.L., Adelberg E.A. Review of Medical Microbiology. Los Altos; 1979.
  19. Hoult J., Krieg N.., Snit P., Staley J., Williams S., eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1986.
  20. Materials of State reports «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population in the Russian Federation of the chief state sanitary doctor of the Russian Federation» (2001 to 2019). Moscow; 2020. (in Russian)
  21. Onishchenko G.G. Effective water disinfection is the basis for preventive measures against infectious diseases. Vodosnabzhenie i sanitarnaya tekhnika. 2005; (12–1): 8–12. (in Russian)
  22. State report «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population in the Russian Federation in 2019». Moscow; 2020. (in Russian)
  23. Saxena G., Bharagava R.N., Kaithwas G., Raj A. Microbial indicators, pathogenic microorganisms and how to monitor them in the aquatic environment. J. Water Health. 2015; 13(2): 319–39. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2014.275
  24. Zhuravlev P.V., Aleshnya V.V., Panasovets O.P., Morozova A.A., Artemova T.Z., Talaeva Yu.G., et al. The significance of glucose positive coliform bacteria and potentially pathogenic bacteria as an indicator of epidemiological safety of tap water. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2013; 92(1): 56–8. (in Russian)
  25. Zhuravlev P.V., Aleshnya V.V., Panasovets O.P. Pathogenicity ferments of bacteria isolated from water of the open reservoirs. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2018; (1): 11–4. (in Russian)
  26. NCBI Taxonomy Database. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/
  27. Trukhina G.M. Sanitary Microbiology. In: Labinskaya A.S., Blinkova L.P., Eshchina A.S., eds. General and Sanitary Microbiology with Microbiological Research Technique. Series «Textbooks for Universities. Special Literature» [Obshchaya i sanitarnaya mikrobiologiya s tekhnikoy mikrobiologicheskikh issledovaniy. Seriya «Uchebniki dlya vuzov. Spetsial’naya literatura»]. St. Petersburg; 2019: 418–95. (in Russian)
  28. Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia. Theodor Escherich. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Escherich
  29. Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia. Escherichia coli. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escherichia_coli
  30. Gavini F., Leclerc H., Mossel D.A.A. Enterobacteriaceae of the «coliform group» in drinking water: identification and worldwide distribution. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1985; 6(3): 312–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(85)80038-2
  31. Byamukama D., Kansiime F., Mach R.L., Farnleitner A.H. Determination of Escherichia coli contamination with chromocult coliform agar showed a high level of discrimination efficiency for differing fecal pollution levels in tropical waters of Kampala, Uganda. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000; 66(2): 864–8.
  32. Baudišová D. Evaluation of Escherichia coli as the main indicator of faecal pollution. Water Sci. Tech. 1997; 35(11–12): 333–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00281-3
  33. Alonso J.L., Soriano A., Carbajo O., Amoros I., Garelick H. Comparison and recovery of colibacillus and thermotolerant forms of colibacillus in water with a chromogenic medium incubated at 41 and 44.5 degrees C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999; 65(8): 3746–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.8.3746-3749.1999
  34. Rakhmanin Yu.A., Ivanova L.V., Artemova T.Z., Gipp E.K., Zagaynova A.V., Maksimkina T.N., et al. Comparative assessment of sanitary and epidemic importance of indicator coliform indices of drinking water quality. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2016; 95(6): 582–8. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2016-95-6-582-588 (in Russian)
  35. Rakhmanin Yu.A., Ivanova L.V., Artemova T.Z., Gipp E.K., Zagaynova A.V., Maksimkina T.N., et al. Comparative assessment of the sanitary and epidemic importance of сoliform indicators of the drinking water quality. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2019; 98(3): 237–49. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2019-98-3-237-249 (in Russian)
  36. McLellan S.L., Daniels A.D., Salmore A.K. Colonial populations of thermotolerant enterobacteriaceae in recreational water and their interaction with fecal E. coli counts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001; 67(10): 4934–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.10.4934-4938.2001

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Zagainova A.V., Trukhina G.M., Rakhmanin Y.A., Artemova T.Z., Sukhina M.A., 2020



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.