Fe- and Cu–Zn-Containing Catalysts Based on Natural Aluminosilicate Nanotubes and Zeolite H-ZSM-5 in the Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide

E. M. Smirnova; Смирнова Е. М.; N. D. Evdokimenko; Евдокименко Н. Д.; M. V. Reshetina; Решетина М. В.; N. R. Demikhova; Демихова Н. Р.; A. L. Kustov; Кустов А. Л.; S. F. Dunaev; Дунаев С. Ф.; V. A. Vinokurov; Винокуров В. А.; A. P. Glotov; Глотов А. П.

doi:10.31857/S0044453723070270

Fe- and Cu–Zn-Containing Catalysts Based on Natural Aluminosilicate Nanotubes and Zeolite H-ZSM-5 in the Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide

Authors: Smirnova E.M.¹, Evdokimenko N.D.², Reshetina M.V.¹, Demikhova N.R.¹, Kustov A.L.², Dunaev S.F.², Vinokurov V.A.¹, Glotov A.P.¹^,2
Affiliations:
1. Gubkin State University of Oil and Gas
2. Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
Issue: Vol 97, No 7 (2023)
Pages: 952-959
Section: ХИМИЧЕСКАЯ КИНЕТИКА И КАТАЛИЗ
Submitted: 27.02.2025
Published: 01.07.2023
URL: https://medjrf.com/0044-4537/article/view/668696
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723070270
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SMHNKL
ID: 668696

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Iron- and Cu–Zn-containing carbon dioxide hydrogenation catalysts based on natural aluminosilicate nanotubes and zeolite H-ZSM-5 are synthesized. Their textural and acidic properties are studied via low-temperature nitrogen adsorption–desorption, temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia, temperature-programmed reduction of hydrogen, and elemental analysis. The effect the temperatures of the reaction have on the conversion of CO2 and distribution of its product is studied. Catalysts based on aluminosilicate halloysite nanotubes exhibit methanol and С2–С4 hydrocarbon selectivities of 88 and 16%, respectively.

Keywords

halloysite, methanol, carbon dioxide, olefins, H-ZSM-5, Fe, Cu–Zn

References

Yang H., Xu Z., Fan M. et al. // J. of Environmental Sciences. 2008. V. 20. № 1. P. 14–27.
Mikkelsen M., Jørgensen M., Krebs F.C. // Energy and Environmental Science. 2010. V. 3. № 1. P. 43–81.
Férey G., Serre C., Devic T. et al. // Chemical Society Reviews. 2011. V. 40. № 2. P. 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00040j
Hunt A.J., Sin E.H.K., Marriott R., Clark J.H. // ChemSusChem. 2010. V. 3. № 3. P. 306–322.
Centi G., Perathoner S. // Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. 2004. V. 153. P. 1–8.
Sai Prasad P.S., Bae J.W., Jun K.W., Lee K.W. // Catalysis Surveys from Asia. 2008. V. 12. № 3. P. 170–183.
Evdokimenko N.D., Kustov A.L., Kim K.O. et al. // Functional Materials Letters. 2020. V. 13. № 4. P. 2040004.
Bogdan V.I., Koklin A.E., Kustov A.L. et al. // Molecules. 2021. V. 26. № 10. P. 2883.
Kovalskii A.M., Volkov I.N., Evdokimenko N.D. et al. // Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2022. V. 303. P. 120891.
Konopatsky A.S., Firestein K.L., Evdokimenko N.D. et al. // J. of Catalysis. 2021. V. 402. P. 130.
Frontera P., Macario A., Malara A. et al. // Functional Materials Letters. 2018. V. 11. № 5. P. 1850061.
Evdokimenko N., Yermekova Z., Roslyakov S. et al. // Materials. 2022. V. 15. № 15. P. 5129.
Ye R.P., Ding J., Gong W. et al. // Nature Communications. 2019. V. 10. № 1. P. 1–15.
Wang G., Mao D., Guo X., Yu J. // International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. № 8. P. 4197–4207.
Tursunov O., Kustov L., Kustov A. // Oil and Gas Science and Technology. 2017. V. 72. № 5. P. 30.
Evdokimenko N.D., Kapustin G.I., Tkachenko O.P. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. № 3. P. 1065.
Li Z., Qu Y., Wang J. et al. // Joule. 2019. V. 3. № 2. P. 570.
Rafiee A., Khalilpour K.R., Milani D. et al. // J. of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2018. V. 6. № 5. P. 5771.
Ni Y., Chen Z., Fu Y. et al. // Nature Communications. 2018. V. 9. № 1. P. 1.
Wang Y., Tan L., Tan M. et al. // ACS Catalysis. 2019. V. 9. № 2. P. 895.
Li Z., Wang J., Qu Y. et al. // Ibid. 2017. V. 7. № 12. P. 8544.
Gao P., Li S., Bu X. et al. // Nature Chemistry. 2017. V. 9. № 10. P. 1019.
Wang J., Zhang A., Jiang X. et al. // J.of CO2 Utilization. 2018. V. 27. № 2. V. 81.
Liu X., Wang M., Zhou C. // Chemical Communications. 2017. V. 54. № 2. P. 140.
Gao P., Dang S., Li S. et al. // ACS Catalysis. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 57.
Wang J., You Z., Zhang Q. et al. // Catalysis today. 2013. V. 215. P. 18.
Wei J., Ge Q., Yao R. et al. // Nature communications. 2017. V. 8. № 1. P. 1.
Rubtsova M., Smirnova E., Boev S. et al. // Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2022. V. 330. № 8. P. 111622.
Afokin M.I., Smirnova E.M., Starozhitskaya A.V. et al. // Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils. 2020. V. 55. № 6. P. 682.
Demikhova N.R., Boev S.S., Reshetina M.V. et al. // Petroleum Chemistry. 2021. V. 61. № 10. P. 1085.
Smirnova E.M., Melnikov D.P., Demikhova N.R. et al. // Petroleum Chemistry. 2021. V. 61. № 7. P. 773.
Glotov A., Vutolkina A., Pimerzin A. et al. // Chemical Society Reviews. 2021. V. 50. № 16. P. 9240.
Mosallanejad S., Dlugogorski B.Z., Kennedy E.M. et al. // ACS Omega. 2018. V. 3. № 5. P. 5362.
Zhu N., Lian Z., Zhang Y. et al. // Applied Surface Science. 2019. V. 483. P. 536.
Oseke G.G., Atta A.Y., Mukhtar B. et al. // J. of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences. 2021. V. 33. № 8. P. 531.
Ayodele O.B., Tasfy S.F.H., Zabidi N.A.M. et al. // J. of CO2 Utilization. 2017. V. 17. P. 273.
Liu Y., Zhang Y., Wang T., Tsubaki N. // Chemistry Letters. 2007. V. 36. № 9. P. 1182.
Cui W.-G., Li Y.-Т., Yu L. et al. // ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2021. V. 13. № 16. P. 18693.
Li C., Yuan X., Fujimoto K. // Applied Catalysis A: General. 2014. V. 469. P. 306.
Kim K.O., Evdokimenko N.D., Pribytkov P.V. et al. // Rus. J. of Physical Chemistry A. 2021. V. 95. № 12. P. 2422.
Bansode A., Urakawa A. // J. of Catalysis. 2014. V. 309. P. 66.
Liu R., Ma Z., Sears J.D. et al. // J. of CO2 Utilization. 2020. V. 41. P. 101290.
Dorner R.W., Hardy D.R., Williams F.W. et al. // Applied Catalysis A: General. 2010. V. 373. № 1–2. P. 112.
Lan L., Wang A., Wang Y. // Catalysis Communications. 2019. V. 130. P. 105761.