New Acacetin Glycosides and Other Phenolics from Agastache foeniculum and Their Influence on Monoamine Oxidase A and B

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors are effective therapeutic agents for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, and natural flavonoids found in Agastache species belong to them. In the present study, six new acylated flavone-O-glycosides were isolated from A. foeniculum and identified using UV, NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry as agastoside A (acacetin 7-O-(2′′-O-malonyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside), B (acacetin 7-O-(4′′-O-malonyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside), C (acacetin 7-O-(2′′,6′′-di-O-malonyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside), D (acacetin 7-O-(4′′,6′′-di-O-malonyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside), E (acacetin 7-O-(2′′-O-malonyl-6′′-O-acetyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside), and F (acacetin 7-O-(4′′-O-acetyl-6′′-O-malonyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside). Using flash chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, an additional 34 known phenolic compounds were detected. A study of biological activity showed that A. foeniculum flavonoids had an inhibitory effect on MAO-A and MAO-B, with the greatest effect noted for acacetin 7-O-glucoside acetate and malonate esters, which may be promising compounds for the development new drugs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. N. Olennikov

Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: olennikovdn@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude, 670047

N. I. Kashchenko

Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS

Email: olennikovdn@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude, 670047

References

  1. Lamptey R.N.L., Chaulagain B., Trivedi R., Gothwal A., Layek B., Singh J. // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022. V. 23. № 1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031851
  2. Youdim M.B.H., Edmondson D., Tipton K.F.// Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2006. V. 7. P. 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1883
  3. Dhiman P., Malik N., Sobarzo-Sánchez E., Uriarte E., Khatkar A. // Molecules. 2019. V. 24. № 418. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030418
  4. Chaurasiya N.D., Midiwo J., Pandey P., Bwire R.N., Doerksen R.J., Muhammad I., Tekwani B.L. // Molecules. 2020. V. 25. № 5358. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225358
  5. Lee H.W., Ryu H.W., Baek S.C., Kang M.-G., Park D., Han H.-Y., Kim H. // Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017. V. 104. P. 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.076
  6. Абрамчук А.В., Карпухин М.Ю. // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2017. № 2. С. 6–9.
  7. Nechita M.-A., Toiu A., Benedec D., Hanganu D., Ielciu I., Oniga O., Nechita V.-I., Oniga I. // Plants. 2023. V. 12. № 2937. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162937
  8. Vogelmann J.E. // Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1984. V. 12. P. 363–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(84)90067-X
  9. Чумакова В.В., Попова О.И., Чумакова В.В. // Растит. ресурсы. 2011. Т. 47. С. 51–55.
  10. Olennikov D.N., Kashchenko N.I. // Agronomy. 2023. V. 13. № 2410. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092410
  11. Olennikov D.N. // Separations. 2023. V. 10. № 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10040255
  12. Olennikov D.N., Kashchenko N.I. // Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2023. V. 59. P. 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683823040099
  13. Olennikov D.N., Chirikova N.K. // Chem. Nat. Compd. 2019. V. 55. P. 1032–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-019-02887-1
  14. Olennikov D.N. // Chem. Nat. Compd. 2022. V. 58. P. 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-022-03805-8
  15. Seo Y.H., Kang S.-Y., Shin J.-S., Ryu S.M., Lee A.Y., Choi G., Lee J. // J. Nat. Prod. 2019. V. 82. P. 3379–3385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00697
  16. Park S., Kim N., Yoo G., Kim Y., Lee T.H., Kim S.Y., Kim S.H. // Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2016. V. 67. P. 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2016.05.019
  17. Mizuno T., Seto H., Nakane T., Murai Y., Tatsuzawa F., Iwashina T. // Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. B. 2023. V. 49. P. 57–64. https://doi.org/10.50826/bnmnsbot.49.2_57
  18. Kachlicki P., Piasecka A., Stobiecki M., Marczak Ł. // Molecules. 2016. V. 21. № 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111494
  19. Itokawa H., Suto K., Takeya K. // Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981. V. 29. P. 1777–1779. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.29.1777
  20. Olennikov D.N., Kashchenko N.I. // Chem. Nat. Comp. 2016. V. 52. P. 996–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-016-1845-7
  21. Norazhar A.I., Lee S.Y., Faudzi S.M.M., Shaari K. // Appl. Sci. 2021. V. 11. № 3526. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083526
  22. Duda S.C., Marghitas L.A., Dezmirean D., Duda M., Margaoan R., Bobis O. // Ind. Crops Prod. 2015. V. 77. P. 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.045

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. 1. The structure of known flavonoids i–xiv isolated from A. foenicilum: Ac – acetyl, Mal – malonyl.

Download (216KB)
Indexing metadata
3. 2. Mass spectra of compounds I (a), II (b) and III (c): Ac – acetyl, Mal – malonyl.

Download (154KB)
Indexing metadata
4. 3. Structure of carbohydrate fragments of new acacetin glycosides I–VI. The arrows indicate the key correlations in the HMBC spectra.

Download (198KB)
Indexing metadata
5. 4. Chromatogram (HPLC-DMD, λ = 330 nm) of the extract of A. foenicilum flowers and the absorption spectrum of acacetin glycosides (inset).The connection numbers are shown as in Table 4.

Download (139KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences