Comparative analysis of bone volume in the anterior region in patients with protrusion and normal tooth inclination based on CBCT

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The introduction of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) methods allow to most accurately visualize the bone structures of the maxillofacial region, which enables the specialist to obtain a detailed 3D model of the jaws and teeth with a fairly high resolution.

This article provides the use of computed beam tomography method in orthodontic practice to analyze the initial thickness of bone tissue at various levels of the root length of the frontal group of teeth during their retrusion and protrusion. The calculation results allow us to draw conclusions about the volume of bone tissue and the possibility of orthodontic manipulations. The results of the study significantly improve the diagnosis and planning of orthodontic treatment for pathology in the frontal jaw.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Igor’ S. Kopetskiy

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: Nilipelka@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4723-6067

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor

Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow

Anna B. Slabkovskaya

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: Nilipelka@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8154-5093

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor

Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow

Galina S. Kabisova

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: Nilipelka@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8842-768X

MD, PhD

Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow

Nana G. Meskhiya

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: Nilipelka@gmail.ru

ассистент кафедры терапевтической стоматологии, соискатель ученой степени кандидата медицинских наук кафедры терапевтической стоматологии 

Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow

References

  1. Pylypiv N., Chuchmay I. Substantiation of choosing methods of treatment crowded teeth complicated with delayed eruption. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2009; (1): 129-34. (in Russian)
  2. Dreiseidler T., Mischkowski R.A., Neugebauer J., Ritter L., Zöller J.E. Comparison of cone–beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(2): 216-25.
  3. Serova N.S. Dental volumetric tomography in solving some problems of dentistry and maxillofacial surgery. Endodontics Today. 2010; (2): 55-7. (in Russian)
  4. Yaroshevich S.P., Poloneichik A.N. The craniometry of the mandible with the use of cone-beam computed tomography. The measuring of gonial angle and intercondylar distance. Endodontia todau. 2016; (3): 49-51. (in Russian)
  5. Zhulev E.N., Ershov P.E, Ershova O.A. Heads of topographic anatomy of the mandible in patients with muscle-articular dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint and malocclusion. Vyatskiy meditsinskiy vestnik. 2017; (3): 96-9. (in Russian)
  6. Petrenko К.А. The innovative methods of the dental x-ray diagnostics. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal sotsial’nykh i gumanitarnykh nauk. 2016; 4(1): 32-5. (in Russian)
  7. Slabkovskaya A.B., Kopetskiy I.S., Meskhiya N.G. Radiation diagnostics of dentoalveolar abnormalities. The current issue. Zhurnal nauchnykh statey Zdorov’e i obrazovanie v XXI veke. 2017; 9(10): 149-53. (in Russian) doi: 10.26787/nydha-2226-7425-2017-19-10-149-153.
  8. Ron G.I., Elovikova T.M., Uvarova L.V., Chibisova M.A. Digital diagnostics apparently healthy periodontitis on three-dimensional reconstraction of cone beam computed tomography. Aktual’nye problemy v stomatologii. 2015; 11(3-4): 32-7. (in Russian) doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-2015-11-3-4-32-37.
  9. Eremina N.V., Ismailova O.A., Strukov V.I., Kirillova T.V., Posmetnaya T.V. Peculiarities of clinical and X-ray findings at women during postmenopause with chronic generalized periodontitis determined by mineral bone density. Saratovskiy nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2016; 12(4): 586-8. (in Russian)
  10. Bemardes R.A., de Moraes IG, Húngaro Duarte M.A., Azevedo B.C., de Azevedo J.R., Bramante C.M. Use of cone–beam volumetric tomography in the diagnoses of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108(2): 270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.017.
  11. Fedchishin O.V., Fedchishin N.O. Modern diagnostic methods in dentistry. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal (Irkutsk, Russia). 2013; 121(6): 177-9. (in Russian)
  12. Vansvanov M.M., Talimov K.K., Il’yasov A.M., Konkachev E.A., Ilyasova A.M. Сomputed tomographic diagnosis of pathology of the maxillofacial region. Vestnik KazNMU. 2015; (1): 85-8. (in Russian)
  13. Rogatskin D.V. Software for dentofacial computer tomograph – basic functions and their practical usage. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2008; (3): 58-62. (in Russian)
  14. Chibisova M.A. Algorithms for examining patients using dental volumetric tomography in outpatient dental practice. Dental Market. 2010; (3): 76-8. (in Russian)
  15. Naitoh М., Hirukawa A., Katsumata A., Ariji E. Prospective study to estimate mandibular cancellous bone density using large–volume cone–beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010: 21(12): 132-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01950.x.
  16. Savrasova N.A., Melnichenko Y.M., Beletskaja L.Y., Tarasevich O.M. Control of radiation exposure of cone-beam computed tomography. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2016; (2): 19-26. (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Fig. 1. The angle of the incisors.

Download (54KB)
2. Fig. 2. Measurement of bone volume on the upper jaw in incisors with normal and protrusion.

Download (158KB)
3. Fig. 3. Measurement of bone volume on the lower jaw in incisors with normal and protrusion.

Download (152KB)
4. Fig. 4. Measurements of the height of the interdental septum.

Download (139KB)
5. Fig. 5. The average measurement of the alveolar bone of the incisors of the tooth tooth 1.1 in patients with protrusion.

Download (123KB)
6. Fig. 6. The average measurement of the alveolar bone of the incisors of the tooth tooth 2.1 in patients with protrusion.

Download (118KB)
7. Fig. 7. The average measurement of the alveolar bone of the tooth 1.2 in patients with protrusion.

Download (127KB)
8. Fig. 8. The average measurement of the alveolar bone of the tooth 2.2 in patients with protrusion.

Download (121KB)
9. Fig. 9. Average measurements of the alveolar bone of a tooth 3.1 in patients with protrusion.

Download (118KB)
10. Fig. 10. Average values for measuring the alveolar bone of a tooth 4.1 in patients with protrusion.

Download (110KB)
11. Fig. 11. The average measurement of the alveolar bone of the tooth 3.2 in patients with protrusion.

Download (96KB)
12. Fig. 12. The average measurement of the alveolar bone of the tooth 4.2 in patients with protrusion.

Download (100KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: 01016 от 19.07.1995 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies