Hygienic aspects of the information and technological person’s addiction in the new reality

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The spread of information technologies leads to negative consequences associated with the impact on the health of the individual and public health. There are new behavioral addictions, namely information and technological ones. The objective reasons for their occurrence are in the changes taking place in society. They are associated with the informatization and globalization of the post-industrial society. The criteria for excessive use of the Internet are changing. Virtual space appears as a significant part of life reality. Ubiquitous is the regular use of the Internet. Imposed by information technologies lifestyle and worldview can be destructive for the individual. The task of hygienic science is to prevent the psychological distress of a person in new conditions. The purpose of the article is to consider the views of a person’s Internet addiction, the risks, as well as the possibility of psychological distress resulting from the impact of information technologies. Comparative analysis of the views of various authors and their theoretical generalization. A current understanding of the phenomenon of information and technological dependencies is presented. Two conceptual approaches to the consideration of the phenomenon are identified: as a mental pathology and as a person’s state in the continuum of his normal behavior in new life realities. Statistical data characterizing the penetration of social networks into Russian society and quantitative characteristics of the use of the Internet are given. Computer technologies can be a “mental retreat” for humans. However, social networks provide users with isolation in their own socio-cultural shells. The boundaries of the norms and pathologies of Internet use have changed. Indices of overgrowing of enthusiasm for the Internet in addiction are a change in the motives and goals of its use. A risk factor for the psychological well-being of a person is an exposure to manipulative informational influences on the Internet. Social networks are the space and means of such exposure.

Conclusion. The difference between healthy and unhealthy use of the Network is given. The danger for the majority of Internet users was shown not to be an addiction, but exposure to information and psychological effects. It is revealed that in social networks there is a possibility of targeted impacts.

About the authors

Sergey A. Druzhilov

Research Institute for Complex Problems of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases

Author for correspondence.
Email: druzhilov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6252-8551

MD, Ph.D., Associate professor, leading researcher of the Department for human ecology, Research Institute for Complex Problems of Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, 23, Kutuzova Str., Novokuznetsk, 654041, Russian Federation.

e-mail: druzhilov@mail.ru

Russian Federation

References

  1. Rakhmanin Yu.A. Updating the problems of human ecology and environmental health and the ways of solving them. Gigiena i sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal]. 2012; (5): 4-8. (in Russian).
  2. Druzhilov S.A. Contemporary information environment and human ecology: psychological aspects. Gigiena i sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal]. 2018; 97(7): 597-603. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-7-597-603 (in Russian)
  3. Karelin A.O. Information risk factors in post-industrial society. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2013; (5-6): 111-3. (in Russian)
  4. Denisov E.I., Prokopenko L.V., Eremin A.L., Kur’yerov N.N., Bodyakin V.I., Stepanyan I.V. Information as a physical factor: problems of measurement, hygienic assessment and IT automation. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaia ekologiia. 2014; (1): 36-43. (in Russian)
  5. Griffiths M.D. Technological addictions. Clin Psychol Forum. 1995; 76: 14-9.
  6. Denisov E.I., Eremin A.L. Information, health, innovation: hygienic aspects. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2013; (5-6): 114-8. (in Russian)
  7. Mendelevich V.D. Fake diagnoses in psychiatric classifications. Nevrologicheskiy Vestnik. Zhurnal imeni V.M. Bekhtereva. 2018; 50 (4): 15-8. (in Russian)
  8. Young K.S. Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the internet: a case that breaks the stereotype. Psychol Rep. 1996; 79(3 Pt 1): 899-902.
  9. Young K.S. Clinical aspects of Internet addiction disorder. Meditsinskaya psikhologiya v Rossii: nauchnyy setevoy zhurnal. 2015; (4). Available at: http://mprj.ru/archiv_global/2015_4_33/nomer10.php (in Russian; in English)
  10. Moreno М.А., Jelenchick L.A., Christakis D.A. Problematic internet use among older adolescents: A conceptual framework. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013; 29(4); 1879-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.053
  11. Hall A., Parsons J. Internet Addiction: College Student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. J Mental Health Couns. 2001; 23 (4): 312-27.
  12. Caplan S.E. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior. 2002; 18(5): 553-75.
  13. Bianchi A., Phillips J.C. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 8(1): 39-51.
  14. Morahan-Martin J. Internet abuse: Emerging trends and lingering questions. In: Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008: 32-69.
  15. Perezhogin L.O., Vostroknutov N.V. Non-chemical addictions in pediatric psychiatric practice. Rossiyskiy psikhiatricheskiy zhurnal. 2009; (4): 86-91. (in Russian)
  16. Larkin M., Wood R.T., Griffiths M.D. Toward addiction as relationship. Addiction Research and Theory. 2006; 14(3): 207-15.
  17. Soldatkin V.A., Dyachenko A.V., Mavani D.Ch. The concepts of computer addiction development. Sotsial’naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. 2013; 23(3): 104-10. (in Russian)
  18. Schimmenti A., Caretti V. Psychic retreats or psychic pits?: Unbearable States of Mind and Technological Addiction. Psychoanalitic Psychology. 2010; 27(2): 115-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019414
  19. Pariser E. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. N.Y.: Penguin Press, 2011.
  20. How technology changes everything (and nothing) in psychology. 2008 annual report of the APA Policy and Planning Board. American Psychologist. 2009; 64(5): 454-63.
  21. Emelin V.A., Tkhostov A.Sh., Rasskazova E.I. Psychological factors of development and chronicity of technological addictions. Psychological Science and Education. Electronic journal [Psikhologucheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. Elektronnyy zhurnal]. 2013; (1). Available at: http://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2013/n1/59107.shtml (in Russian)
  22. Lyotard J.-F. La Condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Editions de Minuit; 1979.
  23. Objectives of the use of the Internet by the population. In: Information society in the Russian Federation: a statistical compilation [Informatsionnoye obshchestvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: statisticheskiy sbornik]. Moscow: NIU VShE; 2018: 54-6. (in Russian)
  24. Eremin A.L. The impact of the information environment on public health. Problemy sotsial’noy gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny. 2000; (6): 21-4. (in Russian)
  25. Denisov E.I., Eremin A.L. Information, health, innovation: hygienic aspects. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2013; (5-6): 114-8. (in Russian)
  26. Weinstein A., Lejoyeux M. Internet addiction or Excessive Internet Use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010; 36(5); 277-83.
  27. Widyanto L., Griffiths M., Brunsden V. A psychometric comparison of the Internet Addiction Test, the Internet-Related Problem Scale and self-diagnosis. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. 2011; 14(3): 141-9.
  28. Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I. Excessive use of the Internet: factors and signs. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2013; 34(4): 105-13. (in Russian)
  29. Wardle C., Derakhshan H. Information Disorder. Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09. Published by the Council of Europe F-67075. Strasbourg-Cedex, 2017.
  30. Sayapin V.O. Semantic realities of virtual propaganda on the Internet. European Social Science Journal. 2014; (1-2): 23-9. (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Druzhilov S.A.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.