Prenatal ultrasound diagnostics and sociopsychological support as rehabilitation measures in patients with congenital cleft palate complicated by anomalies of other organs and systems

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prenatal ultrasound diagnostics and sociopsychological support in the early rehabilitation of children with congenital cleft palate combined with malformations of other organs and systems complement the unified algorithm of dynamic monitoring and rehabilitation treatment of these patients. Thus, predicting the choice of techniques and the system of rehabilitation prescriptions became possible.

AIM: To present the experience of prenatal ultrasound diagnostics and sociopsychological support during pregnancy for the early rehabilitation of a patient with cleft palate combined with malformations of other organs and systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in the Multiprofile Clinical Medical Center “Bonum” in Yekaterinburg. For 24 years, from the analysis of medical records of the organizational and rehabilitation process of 2,475 patients with congenital cleft lip and/or palate receiving comprehensive care (1998–2022), 823 (33.25%) patients who had with cleft palate and malformations of other organs and systems were enrolled in this study. The discharge epicrises of the pregnancy and the timing of intrauterine ultrasound diagnostics of the fetus were studied, and the history of childbirth and anamnesis of newborns and timing of their routing and registration in the specialized “Bonum” Center were analyzed. At the time of the initial outpatient appointment at the center, parents’ responses to a survey on the nature of emotional and psychological experiences during the prenatal ultrasound examination of the fetus, period of “bearing” pregnancy, and birth of a baby with a complex anatomical and physiological pathology were analyzed.

RESULTS: Ultrasound examination of the fetus during uterine development registered 292 (35.48%) of 823 cases of a combination of congenital cleft palate and anomalies of other organs and systems. The main forms of malformations in the fetus were established in the second (n=99, 33.90%) and third (n=185, 63.36%) trimester pregnancy screening. Mothers who were told about the results of ultrasound diagnostics of the fetus showed anxiety and emotional lability. The use of psychocorrectional and socially significant measures during the diagnosis of fetal pathologies and at the time deciding whether to continue pregnancy, as well as the newborn period, which relieved the psycho-emotional tension of parents, was proposed.

CONCLUSION: Early rehabilitation of patients with congenital cleft palate combined with malformations of other organs and systems should be provided as an integral part of the complex rehabilitation therapy. Sociopsychological support of the family from the period of prenatal diagnosis of the fetus who had multiple malformations is necessary at all stages of pregnancy and rehabilitation treatment of the child.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yulia S. Rogozhina

Multiprofile Clinical Medical Center «Bonum»; Ural State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: rogozhina.u@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9484-6397
SPIN-code: 8619-2137

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg; Yekaterinburg

Svetlana I. Blokhina

Ural State Medical University

Email: kdvo@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0872-0574
SPIN-code: 9877-9215

 MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), professor

Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg

Evgenia S. Bimbas

Ural State Medical University

Email: bimbases@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4122-2518
SPIN-code: 7035-6204

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), professor

Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg

Evgenia S. Naboichenko

Ural State Medical University

Email: dhona@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7315-6741
SPIN-code: 2201-3224

Dr. Sci. (Psychology), professor

Russian Federation, Yekaterinburg

References

  1. Egorova MV, Ivanova ES, Amkhadova MA. Implementation of early comprehensive rehabilitation of children with cleft lip and palate using the example of the Moscow region. Stomatology. 2020;99(6-2):10–14. EDN: ARJSOF doi: 10.17116/stomat20209906210
  2. Rogozhina YuS, Blokhina SI, Bimbas ES. On the issue of surgical treatment of patients with congenital orofacial clefts combined with other organ and system comorbidities. Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Prophylaxis. 2023;23(3):281–294. EDN: EIRLEU doi: 10.33925/1683-3031-2023-658
  3. Rogozhina YuS, Blokhina SI, Bimbas ES, Galeeva KV. Modern tactics of follow-up care and treatment of patients with congenital maxillofacial defects combined with other comorbid conditions. Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Prophylaxis. 2023;23(2):92–103. EDN: BOXMRA doi: 10.33925/1683-3031-2023-606
  4. Mamedov AA, Volkov YuO, Korsunsky АА, et al. Interdisciplinary care for newborns with cleft lip and palate in a children’s multidisciplinary hospital. Lechaschi vrach. 2021;(8):39–44. EDN: YQGNLN doi: 10.51793/OS.2021.24.8.006
  5. Saidova GB, Prityko AG, Suleymanov AB, et al. Goals and objectives in the elimination of congenital malformations of the maxillofacial region in children with severe comorbidities. Quantum Satis. 2023;6(2):81–84. (In Russ). EDN: MJZCNL
  6. Sekhon PS, Ethunandan M, Markus AF, et al. Congenital anomalies associated with cleft lip and palate-an analysis of 1623 consecutive patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(4):371–378. doi: 10.1597/09-264
  7. Sato Y, Yoshioka E, Saijo Y, et al. Associated congenital anomalies and syndromes of 248 infants with orofacial clefts born between 2011 and 2014 in the Japan environment and children’s study. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2023;63(1):9–15. doi: 10.1111/cga.12496
  8. Vibert F, Schmidt G, Löffler K, et al. Accuracy of prenatal detection of facial clefts and relation between facial clefts, additional malformations and chromosomal abnormalities: a large referral-center cohort. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. (In press). doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07084-8
  9. Vasil’ev YuA, Red’ko AN, Gulenko OV, Udina IG. Prenatal ultrasonic detection of congenital clefts of lip and palate in Krasnodarskii Krai. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2017;21(4):190–193. (In Russ). EDN: ZGZFGH doi: 10.18821/1728-2802-2017-21-4-190-193
  10. Guyot A, Soupre V, Vazquez MP, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: retrospective study and review. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013;42(2):151–158. (In French). doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.08.002
  11. Kazantseva AV, Prokhorova OV, Naboychenko ES, et al. Analysis of the influence of the level of awareness of pregnant women on readiness for birth. System Integration in Health Care. 2022;4(57): 5–11. EDN: JSJAIX
  12. Robbins JM, Damiano P, Druschel CM, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts: association with maternal satisfaction, team care, and treatment outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47(5): 476–481. doi: 10.1597/08-177
  13. Silva VAPD, Gifalli M, Capone FA, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts: unveiling the parents’ experience. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023;41:e2022004. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2022004
  14. James JN, Schlieder DW. Prenatal counseling, ultrasound diagnosis, and the role of maternal-fetal medicine of the cleft lip and palate patient. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016;28(2): 145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2015.12.005
  15. Hammoudeh JA, Imahiyerobo TA, Liang F, et al. Early cleft lip repair revisited: a safe and effective approach utilizing a multidisciplinary protocol. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(6):e1340. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001340
  16. Wlodarczyk JR, Wolfswinkel EM, Liu A, et al. Early cleft lip repair: demonstrating efficacy in the first 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(5):1073–1080. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009634
  17. Suleymanov AB, Prityko AG. Early treatment and rehabilitation of children with congenital cleft lip and palate. Quantum Satis. 2021;4(1-4):133–134. (In Russ). EDN: IUBNJC
  18. Oftedal A, Bekkhus M, Haugen GN, et al. The impact of diagnosed fetal anomaly, diagnostic severity and prognostic ambiguity on parental depression and traumatic stress: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(11):1291–1299. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14453
  19. Altunhan H, Annagür A, Konak M, et al. The incidence of congenital anomalies associated with cleft palate/cleft lip and palate in neonates in the Konya region, Turkey. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(6):541–544. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.08.001
  20. Erinoso OA, James O, Sokunbi OJ, et al. Congenital heart defects in orofacial cleft: a prospective cohort study. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021;18(4):219–223. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_159_20
  21. Farladansky-Gershnabel S, Gluska H, Halevi N, et al. Cleft lip and/or cleft palate: prenatal accuracy, postnatal course, and long-term outcomes. Children (Basel). 2022;9(12):1880. doi: 10.3390/children9121880
  22. Mak ASL, Leung KY. Prenatal ultrasonography of craniofacial abnormalities. Ultrasonography. 2019;38(1):13–24. doi: 10.14366/usg.18031
  23. Nagalo K, Ouédraogo I, Laberge JM, et al. Congenital malformations and medical conditions associated with orofacial clefts in children in Burkina Faso. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0833-9
  24. Sanchez MLN, Benjamin RH, Mitchell LE, et al. Birth defect co-occurrence patterns among infants with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(4):417–426. doi: 10.1177/10556656211010060
  25. Sun T, Tian H, Wang C, et al. A survey of congenital heart disease and other organic malformations associated with different types of orofacial clefts in Eastern China. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054726
  26. Leonov AG, Baranskaya LT. Psychological aspects of early surgery in cases of congenital facial and jaw pathology. Ural Medical Journal. 2009;(6):88–93. EDN: KXJKBV
  27. Naboychenko ES, Ulyashina EI. Personal characteristics and child-parent relations as psychological factors of stigmatization of families raising a child with an atypical appearance. System Integration in Health Care. 2021;(1):53–59. EDN: UUXZZJ
  28. Guichoud Y, El Ezzi O, de Buys Roessingh A. Cleft lip and palate antenatal diagnosis: a swiss university center performance analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(15):2479. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152479
  29. Lai GP, Weng XJ, Wang M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of prenatal fetal ultrasound to detect cleft palate in high-risk fetuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(3):605–614. doi: 10.1002/jum.15736
  30. Pankova EE, Matulevich SA, Glikhina TA, Klipa MV. Genetic monitoring of congenital malformations within the prenatal diagnostics efficiency assessment system in Krasnodar Region. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2010;8:150–154. EDN: OCQGJH

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Age of the mothers at the time of birth (n=823). ИП — intensive indicator; m — representativeness error.

Download (635KB)
3. Fig. 2. Main concomitant developmental anomalies in 823 patients with congenital cleft palate, n/%. CVS — cardiovascular system; GIT — gastrointestinal tract.

Download (704KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия  ПИ № ФС 77 - 86296 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies