Adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity: etiomorphopathogenesis, clinic, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention at the present stage

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

During surgery of the gastrointestinal tract, peritoneal adhesions are detected in 80–90% of cases, including in open surgical interventions, and abdominal adhesions occur in 70–90% of patients, with laparoscopic — in 24–35% of patients. The number of deaths from adhesive disease ranges from 14 to 52% and reaches 68% in patients aged >60 years with concomitant pathology.

The main etiological factors of adhesions are mechanical, chemical, physical, and infectious effects. The pathogenesis of adhesion formation includes three processes: inhibition of fibrinolytic and extracellular matrix degradation systems; inflammatory reaction with cytokine production, mainly transforming growth factor β1; and tissue hypoxia due to interruption of blood supply to mesothelial cells and submesothelial fibroblasts. Clinically, adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity is characterized by dyspeptic disorders in the early stages and is accompanied by intestinal obstruction in advanced cases. Adhesive disease treatment can be performed using conservative therapy or surgical intervention. To date, prevention is the most preferred method to impede the consequences of the development of adhesive disease.

Despite improvements in surgical techniques and the development of new approaches to treatment and diagnosis, adhesions remain an inevitable consequence of intra-abdominal operations. Understanding the pathogenesis of the formation of the adhesive process and adhesion and possibility of their transformation, especially at the cellular and molecular level, is beneficial for the development of more effective methods of treatment and prevention of adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Artyom S. Sundeev

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: sugery@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3846-2046
SPIN-code: 8118-2870
Russian Federation, Voronezh

Alexander A. Andreev

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: sugery@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8215-7519
SPIN-code: 1394-5147

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Voronezh

Anastasia Yu. Laptiyova

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: laptievaa@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3307-1425
SPIN-code: 7626-9016
Russian Federation, Voronezh

Pavel A. Sazonov

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: o25x@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-7737-4358
SPIN-code: 4526-1477
Russian Federation, Voronezh

Ekaterina V. Grigorieva

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: katerina.grigorieva.00@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-9037-4813
SPIN-code: 1283-7280
Russian Federation, Voronezh

Anton P. Ostroushko

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: anton@vrngmu.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3656-5954
SPIN-code: 9811-2385

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor

Russian Federation, Voronezh

Yaroslav I. Kartashov

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: zhecbrr@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-9754-0508
SPIN-code: 7840-4085
Russian Federation, Voronezh

Alexandra V. Puchnina

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Author for correspondence.
Email: sugery@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3840-7227
SPIN-code: 4099-3878
Russian Federation, Voronezh

References

  1. Kitaev AV, Hayrapetyan AT, Turlai DM, Adhesive peritoneal disease in an experiment. Prevention and treatment. Koloproktologia. 2016;(S1):118a. (In Russ.) EDN: WKLDKX
  2. Fedorov VD, Kubyshkin VA, Kozlov IA. Surgical «epidemiology» of the formation of adhesions in the abdominal cavity. Surgery. 2004;(6)50–53. (In Russ.)
  3. Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(41):4545–4553. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4545
  4. Klyuiko DA, Korik VE, Zhidkov SA. Comprehensive treatment of patients with adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity. Military Medicine. 2023;(1):13–21. EDN: POYDNS doi: 10.51922/2074-5044.2023.1.13
  5. Totikov VZ, Kalitsova MV, Amrillaeva VM. Therapeutic and diagnostic program for acute adhesive obturation of small bowel obstruction. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2006;(2):38–43. (In Russ.)
  6. Murphy DJ, Peck LS, Detrisac CJ, et al. Use of a high-molecular-weight carboxymethylcellulose in a tissue protective solution for prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions in ponies. Am J Vet Res. 2002;63(10):1448–1454. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.1448
  7. Wu F, Li Y, Yang Q, et al. Transcriptome sequencing analysis of primary fibroblasts: a new insight into postoperative abdominal adhesion. Surg Today. 2022;52(1):151–164. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02321-6
  8. Nehéz L, Tingstedt B, Vödrös D, et al. Novel treatment in peritoneal adhesion prevention: protection by polypeptides. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41(9):1110–1117. doi: 10.1080/00365520600554550
  9. Samartsev VA, Gavrilov VA, Pushkarev BS, et al. Peritoneal adhesion: state of issue and modern methods of prevention. Perm Medical Journal. 2019;36(3):72–90. EDN: UUVYOH doi: 10.17816/pmj36372-90
  10. Armashov VP, Belousov AM, Vavshko MV, et al. Can we detect peritoneal adhesions with mri and ct prior to abdominal surgery? Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2023;8(1):97–102. EDN: CEHHRK doi: 10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-1-97-102
  11. Sergeev AN, Morozov AM, Epifanov NYu, et al. Methods for assessing the severity of adhesions in the experiment and clinical setting. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2022;15(3):254–261. EDN: BEPGFZ doi: 10.18499/2070-478X-2022-15-3-254-261
  12. Matveev NL. Adhesions in the abdominal cavity. Methodological recommendations. Moscow; 2007. 41 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Popov AA, Manannikova TN, Kiselev SJu, et al. Prevention of adhesions in gynecological patients. Journal of Obstetrics and Womans Diseases. 2009;58(5):m9a–10. (In Russ.) EDN: KZIUZB
  14. Ozgün H, Cevikel MH, Kozaci LD, Sakarya S. Lexipafant inhibits postsurgical adhesion formation. J Surg Res. 2002;103(2):141–145. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6357
  15. Getsadze GN. Methods of reducing adhesions in the abdominal cavity in experiment. In: Achievements of fundamental, clinical medicine and pharmacy: proceedings of the 75th scientific session of the university staff. Vitebsk: Vitebsk State Medical University; 2019. P. 5–7. EDN: NYRLOB
  16. Cheong YC, Laird SM, Li TC, et al. Peritoneal healing and adhesion formation/reformation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(6):556–566. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.6.556
  17. Melnikov NV, Zubeev PS, Pozdnyakov SB. 10-year experience of using bipolar bi-instrumental coagulation in endosurgery. Endoscopic surgery. Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Congress on Endoscopic Surgery. 2005;(1):84. (In Russ.)
  18. Moris D, Chakedis J, Rahnemai-Azar AA, et al. Postoperative abdominal adhesions: clinical significance and advances in prevention and management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1713–1722. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3488-9
  19. Atta HM. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(46):5049–5058. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i46.5049
  20. Nehéz L, Vödrös D, Axelsson J, et al. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: effects of lysozyme, polylysine and polyglutamate versus hyaluronic acid. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(9):1118–1123. doi: 10.1080/00365520510023332
  21. Tingstedt B, Isaksson K, Andersson E, Andersson R. Prevention of abdominal adhesions — present state and what’s beyond the horizon? Eur Surg Res. 2007;39(5):259–268. doi: 10.1159/000102591
  22. Filenko BP, Lazarev SM. Prophylactics and treatment of peritoneal commissures. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2012;171(1):70–74. EDN: OOSPAN
  23. Alekseev AA, Sulima AN. Modern concepts of pelvic adhesions’ etiology and pathogenesis at reproductive age women. Medical Herald of the South of Russia. 2016;(1):4–14. EDN: WESYKV
  24. Thakur M, Rambhatla A, Qadri F, et al. Is There a genetic predisposition to postoperative adhesion development? Reprod Sci. 2021;28(8):2076–2086. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00356-7
  25. Jendresen MB, Qvist N. Postoperative peritoneale adhaerencer. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008;170(42):3321–3324.
  26. Beyene RT, Kavalukas SL, Barbul A. Intra-abdominal adhesions: anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Curr Probl Surg. 2015;52(7):271–319. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2015.05.001
  27. Bensman VM, Savchenko YuP, Sahakyan EA, Malyshko VV. Peritoneum viscera-parietal adhesive disease and laparotomy wound healing for peritonitis. Siberian Medical Review. 2019;(5):72–79. EDN: MNVYSF doi: 10.20333/2500136-2019-5-72-79
  28. Zindel J, Peiseler M, Hossain M, et al. Primordial GATA6 macrophages function as extravascular platelets in sterile injury. Science. 2021;371(6533):eabe0595. doi: 10.1126/science.abe0595
  29. Wang R, Guo T, Li J. Mechanisms of peritoneal mesothelial cells in peritoneal adhesion. Biomolecules. 2022;12(10):1498. doi: 10.3390/biom12101498
  30. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, et al. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc. 2004;18(6):898–906. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9233-3
  31. Thompson J. Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation. Dig Surg. 1998;15(2):153–157. doi: 10.1159/000018610
  32. Markosian SA, Lysyakov NM. Etiology, pathogenesis and prevention of adhesions in abdominal surgery. Surgery News. 2018;26(6):735–744. EDN: VUBADW doi: 10.18484/2305-0047.2018.6.735
  33. Sotnikova ES, Britikov VN, Andreev AA, et al. Model of abdominal adhesions. Molodezhnyj innovacionnyj vestnik. 2017;6(2):9–10. EDN: YTOWFF
  34. Boyko VV, Yevtushenko DA. Genetic factors in the pathogenesis of adhesive disease of the peritoneum. Avicenna Bulletin. 2015;(2):25–30. EDN: UHCLKJ
  35. Krieger AG, Andreytsev IL, Gorsky VA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Surgery. 2001;7:25–29. (In Russ.)
  36. Filenko BP, Zemlyanoi VP, Borsak II, Ivanov AS. Adhesion disease: prevention and treatment. Saint Petersburg: Northwestern State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; 2013. 139 p. EDN: UIRFYF
  37. Kholmatov PK, Nazarov ShK, Jonov BN, Komilov F. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of peritoneal adhesive disease. Avicenna Bulletin. 2012;(1):155–160. (In Russ.) EDN: PBOCEX
  38. Francois Y, Mouret P, Tomaoglu K, Vignal J. Postoperative adhesive peritoneal disease. Laparoscopic treatment. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(7):781–783. doi: 10.1007/BF00593440
  39. Zakharov IS, Ushakova GA, Demyanova TN, et al. Adhesive disease of the pelvic organs: modern prevention opportunities. Consilium Medicum. 2016;18(6):71–73. EDN: XAMAYZ doi: 10.26442/2075-1753_2016.6.71-73
  40. Klyuiko DA. Analysis of the results of treatment of patients with abdominal adhesions and its complications. Medicinskie novosti. 2022;(4):58–61. EDN: YQDRKF
  41. Tikhomirov AL, Manukhin IB, Kazenashev VV. The modern approach to the prevention of complications in the treatment of inflammatory diseases of the genital pelvic organs. Gynecology. 2016;18(1):30–33. EDN: VRFEMF doi: 10.26442/2079-5696_18.1.30-33
  42. Jagirdar RM, Pitaraki E, Rouka E, et al. Differential effects of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids on human mesothelial and endothelial cells in 2D and 3D phenotypes. Artif Organs. 2024;48(5):484–494. doi: 10.1111/aor.14703
  43. Cao H, Duan L, Zhang Y, et al. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):426. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00830-x
  44. Annarazov YA, Satkanbayev AZ, Roland EK. Innovative 3D printing prevention adhesive disease. Vestnik Kazahskogo nacional’nogo medicinskogo universiteta. 2016;(4):183–185. EDN: YOEURT
  45. Egorlu A, Demirci S, Kurtman C. Prevention of intraabdominal adhesions by using Seprafilm in rats undergoling bowel resection and radiation therapy. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(6):1404–1408.
  46. Aysan E, Ayar E, Aren A, Cifter C. The role of intra-peritoneal honey administration in preventing post-operative peritoneal adhesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;104(2):152–155. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00070-2
  47. Styazhkina SN, Menshikova MA, Derbeneva IO. Adhesive disease as a surgical problem. Problemy sovremennoj nauki i obrazovanija. 2017;(16):103–104. EDN: YLKBKD
  48. Sopuev AA, Mamatov NN, Ormonov MK, et al. Barrier drugs in the prevention of abdominal adhesions (literature review). Vestnik of KSMA named after I.K. Akhunbaev. 2020;(3):46–55. EDN: WWAVRZ
  49. Cubukçu A, Alponat A, Gönüllü NN. Mitomycin-C prevents reformation of intra-abdominal adhesions after adhesiolysis. Surgery. 2002;131(1):81–84. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.118316.
  50. Atta HM. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: the promising role of gene therapy. Gastroenterologist in the World. 2011;17(46):5049–5058.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия  ПИ № ФС 77 - 86296 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies