Predictors of the quality of life of medical university students in the initial period of schooling

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access


AIM: This study aimed to examine prognostic parameters of health-related quality of life of medical students to determine the possibilities of its correlation with subsequent optimization of the educational environment of the university.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from 02/01/2017 to 01/10/2020 at the School of Biomedicine of the Far Eastern Federal University and the Pacific State Medical University. It included 496 students of both sexes [251 (50.6%) women, 245 (49.4%) men; average age, 20.4 years] enrolled in 1–3 medical courses. Demographic characteristics, education and living conditions, and morbidity data were collected using the comprehensive I.V. Pozdeeva questionnaire (2008) supplemented by authors as well as the standard medical documentation of the polyclinic. The MOS SF-36 Health-Related Quality of Life Brief Self-Assessment Questionnaire was used to evaluate the health-related quality of life. The Academic Motivation Scale questionnaire survey was performed, and statistical data on academic performance were collected using K. Maslach and S. Jackson questionnaire for the administrative offices of educational institutions.

RESULTS: The following scores were obtained on the self-assessment of the quality of life: physical functioning, 58.8 points; role functioning, 27.4 points; somatic pain (reverse assessment), 79.4 points; general well-being, 48.6 points; hardiness, 61.2 points; social functioning, 57.3 points; emotional status, 51.0 points; psychological comfort, 53.7 points. The students showed a high level of motivation to learn (47.7–59.8 points by the Vallerand scale) and a low professional burnout index (24.9–44.0 by Maslach and Jackson scale); the performance indicators were 4.1–4.6 points. Each parameter of self-assessment of physical and mental state is significantly associated with the composite average assessment of the health-related quality of life (r=0.49–0.86; p<0.05). The health-related quality of life of medical students was found to be associated with academic performance (β=0.27, p<0.05), but motivation to study (β=0.35, p<0.05) was not correlated with the level of professional burnout. A strong relationship was also found between health-related quality of life and comorbidity (β=−0.30, p<0.05) and sports (β=0.27, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The scores on the total self-assessment of the quality of life by medical students are within the normal range. Most students are highly motivated to learn, perform well, and have little or no burnout. The health-related quality of life of medical students at the start of their schooling is reliably influenced by academic performance, motivation to study, and level of chronic morbidity and physical activity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir V. Kuznetsov

Pacific State Medical University

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5320-5876

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Vladivostok

Kirill V. Kosilov

Far Eastern Federal University

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9747-3100

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, 165 Okeanskiy avenue, 690922, Ayax, 10, F733, Vladivostok

Ekaterina K. Fedorishcheva

Pacific State Medical University

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9428-3248
Russian Federation, Vladivostok

Elena Yu. Kostina

Far Eastern Federal University

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4482-9497

MD, Cand. Sci. (Soc.)

Russian Federation, 165 Okeanskiy avenue, 690922, Ayax, 10, F733, Vladivostok

Olga A. Barabash

Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2666-9696

Dr. Sci. (Ped.)

Russian Federation, Vladivostok


  1. Babina VS. Student health problems. Molodoi uchenyi. 2015;(11):572–575.
  2. Bili-Lazar’ AA, Khlebutina EV, Vol’skii VV. Causes of deteriorating health status of student youth. Nauchnye issledovaniya. 2018;(3): 64–67.
  3. Zhuravleva IV, editor. Student health: sociological analysis. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN; 2012.
  4. Artemenkov AA. The complex program of health improvement in students with deadaptation disorders. Ross Med Zh. 2017;23(3):142–147. doi: 10.18821/0869-2106-2017-23-3-142-147
  5. Bobyleva OV. State of health of student’s youth as a social and ecological problem. Vestnik TGU. 2013;18(3):852–854.
  6. Akopyan AN. Research of pre-examination psychoemotional state of students. Vestnik vosstanovitel’noi meditsiny. 2010;(6):36–39.
  7. Rasskazova EI. The stage models of behavior change in health psychology: opportunities and limitations. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya XIV: Psikhologiia. 2014;(4):102–119.
  8. Nikolayeva NI, Porfiryeva TI, Gumenyuk VI. Unfavorable factors of educational space. Zdravookhr Ross Fed. 2011;(1):28–31.
  9. Novokhatskaya EA, Yakovleva TP, Kalitina MA. The morbidity of students conditioned by diet character in modern condition of education. Probl Sotsialnoi Gig Zdravookhranenniiai Istor Med. 2017;25(5):281–285. doi: 10.18821/0869-866X-2017-25-5-281-285
  10. Proskuryakova LA, Lobykina EN. Structure and evaluation of the effectiveness of measures of the system of preservation of students’ health. Gig Sanit. 2017;96(1):79–84.doi: 10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-1-79-84
  11. Minnibaev TS, Melnichenko PI, Prokhorov NI, et al. Investigation of the impact of conditions and the organization of education on the indices of performance and health of students. Gig Sanit. 2015;94(4):57–60.
  12. Zvonikov VM, Rojzman IV. The interconnection of adaptability references with student’s character accentuations. Vestnik vosstanovitel’noi meditsiny. 2014;(2):2–5.
  13. Lyndon MP, Henning MA, Alyami H, et al. The Impact of a Revised Curriculum on Academic Motivation, Burnout, and Quality of Life Among Medical Students. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2017;(4):2382120517721901.
  14. Kuznetsova AA. Impact of Cognitive Styles on Student Academic Performance. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya. 2015;(11-1):35–36.
  15. Kovaleva IV, Shtepa YP. Analysis of factors affecting student performance based on the use of information technology. 2016;3(48):382–385.
  16. Sagidullina LS, Xetayeva GK, Orynbasarova KK, et al. External factors affecting the succession of students. Vestnik KazNGMU. 2017;(4):289–294.
  17. Kunanitthaworn N, Wongpakaran T, Wongpakaran N, et al. Factors associated with motivation in medical education: a path analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1256-5
  18. Gerasimenko NA. Motivation of students to learn: social and psychological aspect. Vestnik Universiteta. 2017;(7–8):179–182.
  19. Shulgina TA, Ketova NA, Kholodova KA, Severinov DA. Motivating students to participate in professionally oriented events management. Obrazovanie i nauka. 2018;20(1):96-115.doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-1-96-115
  20. Boni RA, Paiva CE, de Oliveira MA, et al. Burnout among medical students during the first years of undergraduate school: Prevalence and associated factors. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0191746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.019174621
  21. Vlakh NI. Features of syndrome of emotional burnout among health professionals. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2017;10(1):5–11. doi: 10.14529/psy170101
  22. Ivanova SP. Stress and emotional burnout among full-time students. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoi protivopozharnoi sluzhby MChS Rossii. 2016;(4):198–202.
  23. Gorshkov EA, Kosonogova VI. Investigation of burnout syndrome in undergraduate students. Molodoi uchenyi. 2015;(23-2):51–55.
  24. Ivanova PF, Lyukina AN, Petrova MP, Saveliev VN. Influence of morbidity on the accessibility of ISMA’s students medical and pediatric faculties. Sinergiya nauk. 2018;(19):925–929.
  25. Zagorodnikov AG, Popov VI, Zagorodnikov GG, Gorichny VA. Connection of overall incidence with success of teaching students of different somatotypes. Vestnik Rossiiskoi voenno-meditsinskoi akademii. 2014;(4):182–184.
  26. Irhin VN, Zhuravlev YI, Zhernakova NI, et al. The comparative analysis of subjective and objective estimations of students’ health during realization of the innovative educational program of “Health-keeping”. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2009;(6):149–153.
  27. Byankina LV, Izotova VM, Hotimchenko AV, Tsuman NA. Self-esteem of the health by the professional education institutions students of Khabarovsk as a component of their psychophysical condition. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta. 2014;(4):24–28.
  28. Kornienko DS, Kozlov AI, Otavina ML. Differences in self-assessment of health and psychological wellbeing between healthy and unhealthy young adults. Gig Sanit. 2016;95(6):577–581.doi: 10.18821/0016-9900-2016-95-6-577-581
  29. Alekseenko SN, Drobot EV. Category viability and quality of life among students of medical school in conjugation with the selfassessment of healthaspects healthy. Zemskii vrach. 2014;(2):41–44.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
1. Fig. 1. State of physical and mental health of students of medical specialties in the self-assessment of health according to the MOS SF-36 version questionnaire (n=496). MOS SF-36v2 Health Status Survey –Short Form 36v2: “A short form of self-assessment of health-related quality of life”; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; physical health assessment subscales: PF, physical functioning; RF, role functioning; SP, somatic pain; GWB, general well-being; mental health assessment subscale: H, hardiness; SF, social functioning; ES, emotional status; PC, psychological comfort.

Download (110KB)
2. Fig. 2. Correlation of each self-assessment parameters of physical and mental health of students with a composite assessment of health-related quality of life (n=496). Physical health subscale: PF, physical functioning; RF, role functioning; SP, somatic pain; GWB, general well-being; mental functioning subscale: H, hardiness; SF, social functioning; ES, emotional status; PC, psychological comfort.

Download (55KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: 01016 от 19.07.1995 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies