Marginal ulcer causing anastomotic perforation and delayed penetration following mini gastric bypass

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study presents a rare clinical case of progressive chronic ulcer of the gastrojejunoanastomosis in a young female patient who developed two classical complications, particularly perforation and penetration, within 14 months of undergoing laparoscopic mini gastric bypass. Remarkably, the medical history did not reveal any significant predictors of ulcerogenesis. The ulcer formed within the first six months after mini gastric bypass surgery when taking antisecretory drugs. There was no connection with smoking, helicobacter infection, or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

CLINICAL CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was initially subjected to laparotomy, with perforation suturing and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy performed to exclude the bile reflux into the gastric pouch. The postoperative outcome (ulcer progression with a new complication — penetration — within six months) aligns with the recent literature data on the potential exaggeration of the role of biliary reflux in ulcerogenesis following mini gastric bypass. The follow-up surgery, performed laparoscopically in the presence of significant adhesion formation in the abdominal cavity, involved adhesiolysis, gastric pouch resection with anastomosis, and reconstructive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clinical and endoscopic evaluations ten months after the reconstructive surgery indicates the patient’s recovery.

CONCLUSION: The value of the observation is the possibility of analyzing the effect of the primary operation, which included not only suturing of the perforated defect, but also enteroenterostomy according to Roux to divert bile from the anastomosis. The result of the operation is consistent with the literature data on the possibly exaggerated role of biliary reflux in ulcerogenesis after mini-gastroshunting, which determines the relevance of new studies to identify significant pathogenetic factors, including the length of the pouch and the method of forming a single anastomosis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Aleksandr A. Chaykin

Clinical Hospital «RZD-Medicine»; Center of Endosurgical Technologies

Email: chaiki@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-0994-081X
SPIN-code: 8291-9867

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk

Dmitriy A. Chaykin

Clinical Hospital «RZD-Medicine»; Center of Endosurgical Technologies

Email: Conte4@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0098-1761
SPIN-code: 4098-5263

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk

Yurii S. Vinnik

Clinical Hospital «RZD-Medicine»; Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: yuvinnik@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8995-2862
SPIN-code: 5070-8140

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk

Olga V. Teplyakova

Clinical Hospital «RZD-Medicine»; Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: teplyakova-olga@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0005-3316
SPIN-code: 4975-0569

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk

Aleksandr V. Ilinov

Clinical Hospital «RZD-Medicine»; Center of Endosurgical Technologies; Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: vlad-izumrud@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8247-1388
Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk

Nina V. Boyakova

Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: n79039248058@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1761-4717
SPIN-code: 2081-2424

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk

References

  1. Brown WA, Liem R, Al-Sabah S, et al. Metabolic bariatric surgery across the ifso chapters: key insights on the baseline patient demographics, procedure types, and mortality from the eighth IFSO global registry report. Obes Surg. 2024;34(5):1764–1777. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07196-3
  2. Scavone G, Caltabiano DC, Gulino F, et al. Laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass: anatomic features, imaging, efficacy and postoperative complications. Updates Surg. 2020;72(2):493–502. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00743-4
  3. Moradi M, Kabir A, Khalili D, et al. Type 2 diabetes remission after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): results of the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2022;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01171-8
  4. Lautenbach A, Wernecke M, Mann O, et al. Low-grade hepatic steatosis is associated with long-term remission of type 2 diabetes independent of type of bariatric-metabolic surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(2):530–538. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06406-0
  5. Delko T, Kraljević M, Lazaridis II, et al. Laparoscopic roux-Y-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for obesity: clinical & metabolic results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(7):3875–3886. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10907-7
  6. Hailstone L, Tovmassian D, Nguyen CL, et al. Medium-term outcomes from a series of 1000 one anastomosis gastric bypass in australia: a case series. Obes Surg. 2024;34(6):2111–2115. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07213-5
  7. Kupietzky A, Dodi O, Cohen N, et al. Similar rates of symptomatic marginal ulcers after one-anastomosis-gastric bypass compared to roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2024;34(7):2331–2337. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07298-y
  8. Abu-Abeid A, Litmanovich A, Yuval JB, et al. Marginal ulcer perforation after one anastomosis gastric bypass: surgical treatment and two-year outcomes. J Clin Med. 2024;13(11):3075. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113075
  9. Abou Hussein B, Al Marzouqi O, Khammas A. Anastomotic gastro-jejunal ulcer perforation following one anastomosis gastric bypass: clinical presentation and options of management-case series and review of literature. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2423–2428. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04423-5
  10. Musella M, Vitiello A, Susa A, et al. Revisional surgery after one anastomosis/minigastric bypass: an italian multi-institutional survey. Obes Surg. 2022;32(2):256–265. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05779-y
  11. Sohrabi Maralani M, Azadnajafabad S, Elyasinia F, et al. Postoperative outcomes and advantages of hand-sewn laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: experience on 805 patients. Obes Surg. 2021;31(2):627–633. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04981-8
  12. Chaykin AA, Chaykin DA, Chaykin AN, et al. Short-term outcomes of mechanical and hand-sewn laparoscopic one-anastomosis mini-gastric bypass. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(4):29–37. EDN: HUPLUJ doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202404129
  13. Vinnik YuS, Chaykin AA, Chaykin DA, et al. Bile reflux after laparoscopic mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass: the problem and prevention. Russian Medicine. 2024;30(3):272–284. EDN: HCMZFR doi: 10.17816/medjrf629187
  14. Najjari K, Samimi M, Jangjoo A, et al. Perforation as the first manifestation of marginal ulcer following one anastomosis gastric bypass: a multicenter case series and review of literature. Indian J Surg. 2022. doi: 10.1007/s12262-021-03234-x
  15. Daryabari SN, Maleknia SA, Meimand FE, et al. Phlegmon formation due to perforated marginal ulcer after one anastomosis gastric bypass; conversion to roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a video case report. Obes Surg. 2021;31(11):5102–5103. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05602-8
  16. Vinnik YuS, Chaykin NA, Aksjutenko AN, et al. The long-term results of radical organpreserving operations compared with resection of the stomach and suturing in elderly patients with complicated gastroduodenal ulcer. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2011;4(1):21–28. EDN: NVZSRZ
  17. Ukhanov AP, Zakharov DV, Zhilin SA, et al. Emergency laparoscopy in the treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2022;(12):61–67. EDN: URRDAI doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202212161
  18. Aviran E, Rayman S, Yehuda AB, Goitein D. Marginal ulcer causing delayed anastomotic perforation following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(2):379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.022
  19. Martinino A, Bhandari M, Abouelazayem M, et al. Perforated marginal ulcer after gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(9):1168–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.024
  20. Pope R, English W, Walden RL, et al. Non-operative approach to contained perforated marginal ulcers: a systematic review and case series. Am Surg. 2024;90(4):810–818. doi: 10.1177/00031348231209533

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Erosive ulcerative anastomositis. Chronic ulcer of gastroenteroanastomosis, endophoto.

Download (128KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. The trocar insertion under visual control in condition of pronounced adhesion process in abdominal cavity, intraoperative photography.

Download (105KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Separation of gastroenteroanas-tomosis in the penetrating ulcer zone from the hepatogas-tric ligament of the lesser omentum, intraoperative pho-tography.

Download (144KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. The step of manual formation of the posterior semicircle of gastro-jejunal anastomosis, intraoperative photography.

Download (130KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия  ПИ № ФС 77 - 86296 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г.