Influence of medical and social factors on patients’ satisfaction at the center for reproduction and family planning with medical care

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The constant increase in the number of commercial medical organisations providing medical care using assisted reproductive technology (ART) and compulsory medical insurance funds necessitates the need to control the quality of medical services in this area. An important tool for this control is conducting sociological surveys of women undergoing infertility treatment using in vitro fertilisation (IVF) both in paid and free forms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a random sampling method, an anonymous survey was conducted on 398 patients of the Center for Reproduction and Family Planning in St. Petersburg, which provided medical care for infertility treatment using ART both at the expense of compulsory medical insurance and in paid form. The significance of differences in indicators was assessed using Student’s t-test for quantitative indicators. The significance of differences between qualitative characteristics was checked using contingency tables and Pearson’s chi-square test (χ2). Differences were considered significant at р <0.05.

RESULTS: Despite the high level of patient satisfaction with the provision of medical care using ART, 9.0% of women were partially or completely dissatisfied. Compulsory medical insurance funds were paid for infertility treatment using IVF for 12.1% of patients. The majority of patients paid for medical care themselves (87.9%), of which 13.1% of women believed that the cost of medical services in the center was excessive (χ2=29.08; р=0.000), and 10.9% thought that the cost does not correspond to the level of medical services provided (χ2=25.74; р=0.000). There was no significant influence of age (χ2=4.78; р=0.311), place of residence (χ2=1.79; р=0.409), presence of children (χ2=2.21; р=0.331), employment (χ2=2.91; р=0.233) and forms of payment for treatment (χ2=4.69; р=0.096) on the distribution of patients according to the degree of satisfaction with medical care. At the same time, it was determined that marital status (χ2=6.88; р=0.032) and income level (χ2=60.01; р=0.000) are factors that influence the degree of satisfaction of women with infertility treatment using ART.

CONCLUSION: Many medical and social factors have been identified to significantly affect satisfaction with medical care, such as the patient’s marital status and income level. Simultaneously, the economic form of payment for treatment did not have a significant effect on the degree of satisfaction.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Karina E. Moiseeva

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: karina-moiseeva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3476-5971
SPIN-code: 9105-6669

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), associate professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vadim K. Yuriev

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: yuryev@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6832-2426
SPIN-code: 5323-6370

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Shalva D. Kharbedia

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: ozz.gpma444@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8285-2917
SPIN-code: 7152-1330

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), associate professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ksenia G. Shevtsova

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: audit-line1@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4234-2503
SPIN-code: 5685-3487

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Anna V. Alekseeva

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: A.B.Alekseeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9377-0773
SPIN-code: 3566-8696

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Maria Yu. Kiryushina

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: my.kirushina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7196-1629
SPIN-code: 9135-1125
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Kondratova NV. Methodological approaches for patient satisfaction survey in medical organization. In the World of Scientific Discoveries. 2016;(5):23–37. EDN: WHGPKT
  2. Schneider G, Deev I, Kobyakova O, et al. Assessment of population satisfaction with medical care. Social Aspects of Population Health. 2020; 66(4):4. Available from: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1180/30/lang,ru/ EDN: JDIVXP doi: 10.21045/2071-5021-2020-66-4-4
  3. Moiseeva KE, Alekseeva AV, Berezkina EN. Results of subjective evaluation of the satisfaction of parents of newborns with the attitude of medical staff. Rossiiskii meditsinskii zhurnal (Medical Journal of the Russian Federation, Russian journal). 2020;26(2):85–92. EDN: DUZHRC doi: 10.18821/0869-2106-2020-26-2-85-92
  4. Martirosov A, Cherkasov S, Kamaev Yu, Fedyaeva A. Significance of the degree of compliance as a social characteristic of a patient in shaping his attitude towards the organization of medical care provided in an outpatient setting. Social Aspects of Population Health. 2023;69(4). Available from: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1498/30/lang,ru/ EDN: RKRQCJ doi: 10.21045/2071-5021-2023-69-4-2
  5. Artamonova GV, Makarov SA, Cherkass NV, et al. Patient satisfaction with the quality of medical care as an indicator of the effectiveness of the QMS. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. 2013;(12):32–37. (In Russ). EDN: RTVXOF
  6. Radchenko OR, Mirkhaidarova LR. Portrait of a consumer of the services of non-state commercial medical organizations providing pediatric outpatient care. Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal Pulse. 2023;25(8):21–27. EDN: QFZPJY doi: 10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2023-25-8-21-27
  7. Kobyakova OS, Deev IA, Kulikov ES, et al. The results of study of quality and accessibility of medical care in health care institutions: “Who is guilty and what to do?” Health Care of the Russian Federation. 2016;60(4):219–224. EDN: WGXJOZ doi: 10.18821/0044-197X-2016-60-4-219-224
  8. Yuryev VK, Puzyrev VG, Glushchenko VA, et al. Health economics. Part II. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; 2015. (In Russ). EDN: VKTTLJ
  9. Panov AV, Bykovskaya TYu. Modern approaches to improving the institute of paid medical services in Russia. Research’n Practical Medicine Journal. 2019;6(1):119–131. EDN: QWFJJH doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-1-13
  10. Ivanov DO, Moiseeva KE, Berezkina EN, Chumakova OV. Comparative assessment of medical and social characteristics of families with sick and healthy newborns. Medicina i organizacija zdravoohranenija. 2022;7(2):4–12. EDN: YQXIHQ doi: 10.56871/4353.2022.75.57.001
  11. Sinelnikov AB. Influence of family and demographic status on public opinion about public health service. Social Aspects of Population Health. 2011;(1):2. Available from: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/256/30/ (In Russ). EDN: NQWMVF
  12. Kharitonov SV, Lyamina NP, Golubev MV, Pogonchenkova IV. Factors influencing patients’ satisfaction with medical care during medical rehabilitation. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2020;(3):143. EDN: SLAMLY doi: 10.17513/spno.29824
  13. Cherkasov SN, Martirosov AV, Fedyaeva AV, Kudryashova LV. Marital status of a patient in the formation of his attitude to the organization of medical care provided on an outpatient basis. Vestnik medicinskogo instituta «REAVIZ». Reabilitacija, vrach i zdorov’e. 2023;13(4):175–180. EDN: NIUUJA doi: 10.20340/vmi-rvz.2023.4.OZOZ.1
  14. Zhiltsova EE, Chakhoyan LR, Konovalov OE, Isakov SA. Medical and social characteristics and medical activity of patients with chronic dermatoses. Science of the Young (Enuditio Juvenium). 2019;7(4):526–532. EDN: XBYDQG doi: 10.23888/HMJ201974526-532
  15. Sadovaya MA, Kobyakova OS, Deev IA, et al. Patient satisfaction with medical care. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(1):152–161. EDN: YLMLHJ doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-152-161
  16. Rusanova NE. Assisted reproductive technologies in Russia: history, problems, demographic prospects. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2013;11(1):69–86. EDN: PZZIZB
  17. Isupova O. Assisted reproductive technologies: new opportunities. Demographic Review. 2017;4(1):35–64. EDN: ZGFNJL
  18. Lysenko OV, Smirnova IV. Medical and social characteristics of women aimed at ecology and analysis of unsuccessful attempts. Vitebsk Medical Journal. 2010;9(2):97–101. EDN: MQPTSJ

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Distribution of patients at the Center for Reproduction and Family Planning by income level depending on the economic form of medical care (in percentage of total).

Download (430KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия  ПИ № ФС 77 - 86296 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80632 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies